1,738 publications from this institution
Abstract Tiny ocean plankton (picoplankton) are fundamental for the functioning of the biosphere, but the ecological mechanisms shaping their biogeography are partially understood. Comprehending whether these microorganisms are structured by niche vs. neutral processes is highly relevant in the context of global change. The ecological drivers structuring picoplankton communities differ between prokaryotes and minute eukaryotes (picoeukaryotes) in the global surface ocean: while prokaryotic communities are shaped by a balanced combination of dispersal, selection , and drift , picoeukaryotic communities are mainly shaped by dispersal limitation . Yet, whether or not the relative importance of these processes in structuring picoplankton varies as we dive into the deep ocean was unknown. Here we investigate the mechanisms structuring picoplanktonic communities inhabiting different ocean depths. We analyzed 451 samples from the tropical and subtropical global ocean and the Mediterranean Sea covering the epi- (0-200m), meso- (200- 1,000m), and bathypelagic (1,000-4,000m) depth zones. We found that selection decreased with depth possibly due to lower habitat heterogeneity. In turn, dispersal limitation increased with depth, possibly due to dispersal barriers such as water masses and bottom topography. Picoplankton β-diversity positively correlated with environmental heterogeneity and water mass variability in both the open-ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. However, this relationship tended to be weaker for picoeukaryotes than for prokaryotes. Community patterns were generally more pronounced in the Mediterranean Sea, probably because of its substantial cross-basin environmental heterogeneity and deep-water isolation. Altogether, we found that different combinations of ecological mechanisms shape the biogeography of the smallest members of the ocean microbiome across ocean depths.
Trabajo presentado en la EUR-OCEANS Conference - Ocean deoxygenation and implications for marine biogeochemical cycles and ecosystems, celebrada en Toulouse, Francia, del 24 al 26 de 2011
AME Aquatic Microbial Ecology Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials AME 29:161-172 (2002) - doi:10.3354/ame029161 Abundance of Antarctic picophytoplankton and their response to light and nutrient manipulation Nona S. R. Agawin*, Susana Agustí, Carlos M. Duarte IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados C/ Miquel Marqués 21, 07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Spain *Present address: Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John¹s, A1C 5S7 Newfoundland, Canada. E-mail: nagawin@mun.ca ABSTRACT: The response of Antarctic picophytoplankton to experimental light and nutrient manipulation was tested in a large-scale mesocosm experiment in an iron-rich coastal location in the Bransfield Strait (Johnson Cove) during the austral summer of 2000. The experiment consisted of 8 mesocosm units (25 m3), shaded with screens to provide a light gradient (target irradiance 100, 50, 25 and 10% of the ambient light field). A set of 4 mesocosms encompassing the different light treatments was initially run with the ambient nutrient concentrations and in the remaining 4 mesocosms, ammonium (NH4Cl) was added together with phosphate (KH2PO4) and silicate (Na2SiF6) for the first 11 d of the experiment (Phase I). A second manipulation of light and nutrient (Phase II) was done to confirm the results obtained on Day 16 of the experiment, when the mesocosms shaded to 25% of the ambient light were exposed to full ambient light, and ammonium, was added to both of the mesocosms already receiving 100% ambient light. The importance of light availability was evident in the increased abundance of picophytoplankton with increased irradiance, the response being non linear, with the abundance at full ambient irradiance being comparable, or lower, than that at 50% of the ambient irradiance. There was, in addition, an interaction between light availability and nutrient supply as evidenced by the increased picophytoplankton abundance during the early part of the experiment, with increased nutrient availability in mesocosms exposed to 50 and 100% ambient light, and not in those shaded to 10 and 25% ambient light. The response of photosynthesis to irradiance (P-I curves) showed a strong response to nutrient additions, with extremely high specific photosynthesis rates in the mesocosm with increased nutrient availability and exposed to full ambient light. The response was close to the theoretical maximum possible and provides ample evidence that nutrient additions, particularly ammonium, contribute to the optimum photosynthesis by picophytoplankton in the iron-rich Antarctic coastal waters studied here. KEY WORDS: Picophytoplankton · Antarctica · Light · Nutrient · Mesocosms Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in AME Vol. 29, No. 2. Online publication date: September 23, 2002 Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564 Copyright © 2002 Inter-Research.
لقد أتت التدابير الرامية إلى حِفظ الحياة البحرية ثمارها إذ مكّنت، إلى حدّ الآن، من وقْف التّدهور لعدد من الأنواع وإصلاح نُظم إيكولوجية بحرية متدهورة. بيد أنّ تعافي المحيطات على نطاق واسع، يتطلب مزيدا من الجهود والمثابرة على مكافحة التلوّث، والصّيد المفرط، والآثار الناجمة عن تغيّ المناخ.