1,738 publications from this institution
Seaweed (macroalgae) has attracted attention globally given its potential for climate change mitigation. A topical and contentious question is: Can seaweeds' contribution to climate change mitigation be enhanced at globally meaningful scales? Here, we provide an overview of the pressing research needs surrounding the potential role of seaweed in climate change mitigation and current scientific consensus via eight key research challenges. There are four categories where seaweed has been suggested to be used for climate change mitigation: 1) protecting and restoring wild seaweed forests with potential climate change mitigation co-benefits; 2) expanding sustainable nearshore seaweed aquaculture with potential climate change mitigation co-benefits; 3) offsetting industrial CO2 emissions using seaweed products for emission abatement; and 4) sinking seaweed into the deep sea to sequester CO2. Uncertainties remain about quantification of the net impact of carbon export from seaweed restoration and seaweed farming sites on atmospheric CO2. Evidence suggests that nearshore seaweed farming contributes to carbon storage in sediments below farm sites, but how scalable is this process? Products from seaweed aquaculture, such as the livestock methane-reducing seaweed Asparagopsis or low carbon food resources show promise for climate change mitigation, yet the carbon footprint and emission abatement potential remains unquantified for most seaweed products. Similarly, purposely cultivating then sinking seaweed biomass in the open ocean raises ecological concerns and the climate change mitigation potential of this concept is poorly constrained. Improving the tracing of seaweed carbon export to ocean sinks is a critical step in seaweed carbon accounting. Despite carbon accounting uncertainties, seaweed provides many other ecosystem services that justify conservation and restoration and the uptake of seaweed aquaculture will contribute to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. However, we caution that verified seaweed carbon accounting and associated sustainability thresholds are needed before large-scale investment into climate change mitigation from seaweed projects.
Seagrasses occur in coastal zones throughout the world, in the part of the marine habitat that is most heavily influenced by humans. Decisions about coastal management therefore often involve seagrasses, but despite a growing awareness of the importance of these plants, a full appreciation of their role in coastal ecosystems has yet to be reached. This book provides an entry point for those wishing to learn about their ecology, and gives a broad overview of the state of knowledge, including progress in research and research foci, complemented by extensive literature references to guide the reader to more detailed studies. It will be valuable to students of marine biology wishing to specialize in this area and also to established researchers wanting to enter the field. In addition, it will provide an excellent reference for those involved in the management and conservation of coastal areas that harbour seagrasses.
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 221:117-124 (2001) - doi:10.3354/meps221117 Retrospective estimates of net leaf production in Kandelia candel mangrove forests Sarah C. Coulter1,*, Carlos M. Duarte2, Mai Sy Tuan3, Nguyen Hoang Tri3, Hoang Thi Ha3, Le Huong Giang3, Phan Nguyen Hong3 1University of Victoria, PO Box 3025, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P2, Canada 2Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (IMEDEA), CSIC-Universidad illes Balears, C/ Miquel Marqués 21, 07190 Esporles Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Spain 3Mangrove Ecosystem Research Division, Centre for Natural Resource and Environment Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, So 7, Ngo115, Pho Nguyen Khuyen, Hanoi, Vietnam *Present address: Box 633, Invermere, British Columbia V0A 1K0, Canada. E-mail: scoulter@uvic.ca ABSTRACT: A new, inexpensive, and time-saving method for the estimation of the net production of leaves and reproductive structures of mangroves was applied to 2 Vietnamese stands of Kandelia candel. The method combines the allometric relationship between the number of meristems in trees and their diameter with knowledge of the number of leaf pairs and reproductive structures each meristem develops annually to calculate the net leaf and inflorescence production of each tree in the stand. Each apical meristem of K. candel produced about 6 leaf pairs and 1.3 to 1.9 inflorescences annually, with the number of meristems in each tree increasing to the square of their girth. The size distribution of K. candel was highly skewed at all sites, with an exponential decline in the number of plants as the size increased. The net leaf production (dry wt), calculated by scaling the production per meristem to that of individual trees and then to the entire stand, ranged from 176.5 to 1338.7 g m-2 yr-1 among stands, with an estimated total inflorescence production ranging from 0.91 to 101 g m-2 yr-1. The largest individuals, comprising 10 % of the population, contributed the majority of the stand production. The approach demonstrated overcomes serious deficiencies in the traditional litter-fall method, particularly when applied to developing mangrove stands, and should be applicable to other mangrove species as long as they display clear nodes, leaf, flower and fruit scars, as do other members of the Rhizophoraceae family. KEY WORDS: Mangrove · Primary production · Litterfall · Kandelia candel · Rhizophoraceae · Vietman Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 221. Online publication date: October 18, 2001 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2001 Inter-Research.
Georeferenced database on the spatial properties of all individual shallow-water tropical coral reefs worldwide. The dataset was obtained by processing and analyzing the global-scale coral reef benthic data provided by the Allen Coral Atlas (ACA), a publicly available dataset of high-resolution satellite imagery and machine learning-based coral reef classifications. The original data, already divided into different coral provinces, was segmented to identify the individual reefs of each province using a label assignment algorithm. This allows to analyze several spatial properties of coral reefs such as the size distribution, area-perimeter relationship, fractal dimensions and shape measures. The dataset contains measures of area, perimeter, fractal dimension, compactness and elongation index (diameter ratio) for each individual reef in each coral province.
Data from 69 Florida lakes were used to test 15 empirical models that were developed from a worldwide data base to describe the biomass and cover of aquatic macrophytes in lakes. Ten of the models failed to provide useful predictions in Florida because the models did not adequately reflect the limnological characteristics of Florida lakes. Submerged and emergent biomass in the Florida lakes was predicted by the models that estimated these parameters from the areal cover of submerged and emergent vegetation. Total macrophyte cover in Florida lakes could be predicted from a model based on lake size, annual irradiance at the surface, and the mean annual irradiance within the mean depth of the lake. Even the best models, however, overestimated submerged plant biomass and cover in highly colored (>400 Pt–Co units) lakes and lakes with steep (slope >15%) littorals. This suggests that the influence of light (quantity and quality) and littoral slope on the abundance of aquatic macrophytes needs additional research before improved empirical models can be developed for lakes located in limited geographic regions.
1 Os primeiros passos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Relembrando o contexto: Portugal entre 1807 e 1974 . . . . 10 3 Da critica do jornalismo a teorizacao sobre a liberdade de imprensa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4 Da teorizacao sobre liberdade de imprensa a teorizacao sobre opiniao publica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5 A historia do jornalismo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 6 Conjuntura jornalistica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 7 Jornalistas e vida profissional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 8 Ensino do jornalismo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 9 Teoria do jornalismo (em geral) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 Conclusoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 Bibliografia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161