Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Included in Meta-Analyses: Attitudes, Practice, Evidence and Guides — David Moher (2001) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Included in Meta-Analyses: Attitudes, Practice, Evidence and Guides
Shared by
David Moher
Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Included in Meta-Analyses: Attitudes, Practice, Evidence and Guides
Chapter In A Book
2001
en
Authors
+4 more
David Moher
TK
Terry P. Klassen
AJ
Alison L Jones
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
1999
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
David Moher
,
Cook
,
Jadad
,
Peter Tugwell
,
Moher
,
Jones
,
Pham
,
Klassen
Article
2000
Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement
David Moher
,
Susan Eastwood
,
Ingram Olkin
,
Drummond Rennie
,
Donna F. Stroup
Article
2000
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
David Moher
,
Susan Eastwood
,
Ingram Olkin
,
Drummond Rennie
,
Donna F. Stroup
Article
1999
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
David Moher
,
Susan Eastwood
,
Ingram Olkin
,
Drummond Rennie
,
Donna F. Stroup
Article
1998
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
David Moher
,
Ba’ Pham
,
Alison Jones
,
Alejandro R. Jadad
,
M Moher
,
Peter Tugwell
,
Terry P. Klassen
.webp){kind=small}
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.