Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

David Moher; Susan Eastwood; Ingram Olkin; Drummond Rennie; Donna F. Stroup

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01610.x

Back

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

Article 2000 en

Abstract

1 min read

We hope this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2000

Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement

David Moher, Susan Eastwood, Ingram Olkin, Drummond Rennie, Donna F. Stroup

Article2000

Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM

David Moher, Susan Eastwood, Ingram Olkin, Drummond Rennie, Donna F. Stroup

Article2020

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

Douglas G. Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher

Article2009

Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

Kae Uetani, Takeo Nakayama, Hiroshi Ikai, Naohiro Yonemoto, David Moher

Article2008

Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials Evaluating Herbal Interventions: Implementing the CONSORT Statement

JJ Gagnier, Heather Boon, Paula A. Rochon, David Moher, Jacqueline Barnes, Claire Bombardier