Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM

David Moher; Susan Eastwood; Ingram Olkin; Drummond Rennie; Donna F. Stroup

doi:10.1590/s1135-57272000000200002

Back

Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM

Article 2000 es

Abstract

1 min read

We hope this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2000

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

David Moher, Susan Eastwood, Ingram Olkin, Drummond Rennie, Donna F. Stroup

Article2000

Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement

David Moher, Susan Eastwood, Ingram Olkin, Drummond Rennie, Donna F. Stroup

Article2024

Directrices para presentación de informes de ensayos clínicos sobre intervenciones con inteligencia artificial: extensión CONSORT-AI

Xiaoxuan Liu, Samantha Cruz Rivera, David Moher, Melanie Calvert, Alastair K. Denniston, Grupo de Trabajo Spirit-Ai y Consort-Ai

Article2004

Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement

John P A Ioannidis

Article2021

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a <scp>PRISMA</scp> extension

Rose E. O’Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D. Jennions, Julia Koricheva, Daniel W. A. Noble, Timothy Parker, Jessica Gurevitch, Matthew J. Page, Gavin Stewart, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa