Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ekosistem
Uygulama değiştir
EN
Hakkımızda
SSS
Giriş yap
Başla
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? — David Moher (1998) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Shared by
David Moher
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Article
1998
en
Authors
+4 more
David Moher
BP
Ba’ Pham
AJ
Alison Jones
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
1998
Quality of reports of randomised trials and estimates of treatment efficacy
David Moher
Article
2000
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
Laura McAuley
,
Ba’ Pham
,
Peter Tugwell
,
David Moher
Article
2000
Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement
David Moher
,
Susan Eastwood
,
Ingram Olkin
,
Drummond Rennie
,
Donna F. Stroup
Article
1999
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
David Moher
,
Cook
,
Jadad
,
Peter Tugwell
,
Moher
,
Jones
,
Pham
,
Klassen
Article
2000
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
David Moher
,
Susan Eastwood
,
Ingram Olkin
,
Drummond Rennie
,
Donna F. Stroup
.webp){kind=small}
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.