669 publications from this institution
In this editorial, we describe the experience of the JCI editors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal is to share how we operated during the pandemic, recount how the JCI contributed to the response, highlight some of the major papers we published on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, and impart our insights in the hope that these are helpful to journal editors that may need to deal with similar types of crises in the future.
Abstract Pulmonary arteries of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (SPH) presenting in an idiopathic form (primary PH‐PPH) or associated with congenital heart malformations or collagen vascular diseases show plexiform lesions. It is postulated that in lungs with SPH, endothelial cells in plexiform lesions express genes encoding for proteins involved in angiogenesis, in particular, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and those involved in VEGF receptor‐2 (VEGFR‐2) signalling. On immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, endothelial cells in the plexiform lesions expressed VEGF mRNA and protein and overexpressed the mRNA and protein of VEGFR‐2, and the transcription factor subunits HIF‐1α and HIF‐1β of hypoxia inducible factor, which are responsible for the hypoxia‐dependent induction of VEGF. When compared with normal lungs, SPH lungs showed decreased expression of the kinases PI3 kinase and src, which, together with Akt, relay the signal transduction downstream of VEGFR‐2. Because markers of angiogenesis are expressed in plexiform lesions in SPH, it is proposed that these lesions may form by a process of disordered angiogenesis. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Emerging evidence points to a role for hypoxia-inducible transcription factors in allergic airway inflammation and asthma. The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) family of heterodimeric transcription factors is now known to regulate the activation of different innate immune cell types, and asthma bears the ‘footprints of HIF activation’. In this issue of the Journal, Huerta-Yepez and colleagues used genetic and pharmacologic approaches to explore the role of HIF-1 in mouse models of allergic airway inflammation. These studies support the idea that activation of HIF-1 is required for allergen sensitization and open the door to future therapeutic studies targeting the HIF pathway in allergic diseases. The ability to sense and respond to changes in oxygen (O2) concentration is a fundamental property of all nucleated cells. Exposure to hypoxia results in alterations in gene expression in multiple tissues mediated by the transcription factors of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) family. HIFs are heterodimers comprised of different α subunits and the common HIF-1β subunit (1). HIF-1β (also known as aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator or ARNT) is a constitutively nuclear factor that dimerizes with its binding partners to form an active transcriptional complex. In contrast to HIF-1β, the expression and activity of HIF-1α is regulated by oxygen (O2)-dependent hydroxylation. Under normoxic conditions, degradation of HIF-1α is controlled by binding of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein, which is the recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that targets HIF-1α for proteasomal degradation (2). VHL binds to HIF-1α that is hydroxylated on specific proline residues (Fig. 1) (3). The prolyl hydroxylases that are responsible for this modification use O2 as a substrate under normoxic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, however, HIF-1α prolyl hydroxylation and degradation are attenuated, allowing HIF-1α to translocate to the nucleus, interact with HIF-1β, and bind to specific DNA recognition sequences. This oxygen-sensing mechanism provides a means by which changes in O2 concentration can be rapidly transduced into changes in gene expression. Under normoxic conditions (red arrow, left side), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α is hydoxylated by proline hydroxylases (not shown), binds von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), and is targeted for proteasomal degradation. Under hypoxic conditions (blue arrow, right side), HIF-1α translocates to the nucleus and interacts with HIF-1β (ARNT) to form a transcriptionally active HIF-1 complex. HIF-1α nuclear translocation might also be promoted by other ‘nonhypoxic’ pro-allergic signals. HIF-1 induces the expression of genes that contribute to asthma pathophysiology and might also lead to allergic airway inflammation by regulating cellular and mitochondrial metabolism. HIF-1α was originally identified in a search for DNA-binding factors that induced erythropoietin gene expression in response to hypoxia (4) and is now known to regulate the expression of an array of genes involved in metabolism, cell survival, and angiogenesis (5). Activation of HIF-1 is strongly associated with cancer growth and metastasis, and HIF-1 pathway antagonists are under active development with some candidates already in clinical trials. More recent studies have suggested that HIFs play a wider role in immunity and inflammation, and distinct roles of HIF-1α and HIF-2α are starting to emerge (6, 7) (discussed further below). Standard cell culture conditions (95% air and 5% CO2) expose cells to 20% O2, which is markedly higher than the O2 concentrations to which most immune cells are exposed in vivo. Tissue oxygen concentrations are even lower during inflammation as edema interferes with the diffusion of oxygen from the microvasculature and the infiltration of inflammatory cells results in increased O2 consumption. The concentration of oxygen in secondary lymphoid organs is very low (8), suggesting that HIFs may be activated in lymphocytes during their normal circulation in the body. Although oxygen concentration can affect the acute activation of CD4+ lymphocytes (9), more research is needed to understand potential effects of varying oxygen concentrations on the differentiation and survival of immune cells. In the paper published in this issue of the journal, Huerta-Yepez and colleagues (10) used several approaches to explore the role of HIF-1 in allergic airway inflammation. First, the authors used a conditional deletion strategy and found that HIF-1β-deficient mice were protected from allergen-driven airway inflammation using a well-established model of sensitization to ovalbumin plus alum. Second, the authors complemented this genetic approach with pharmacologic pathway agonists and antagonists (EDHB and 2ME, respectively). Third, the authors showed that HIF-1α an HIF-2α expression are upregulated in cells and endobronchial biopsies from human subjects following allergen challenge. Taken together, these studies suggest that HIFs play a role in allergic airway inflammation. The findings of Huerta-Yepez and colleagues are in keeping with the growing appreciation of the ‘footprints of HIF activation’ in asthma. For example, the expression of several HIF-1 target genes is increased in the airway in asthma including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (11, 12). In addition to promoting vascular remodeling and lymphangiogenesis, VEGF contributes to T-cell activation in response to inhaled allergens through distinct effects on dendritic and T cells (13, 14). A nonbiased proteomic analysis revealed that several hypoxia-inducible, HIF-1-regulated proteins are upregulated in the lung in a mouse model of asthma, including several enzymes involved in glycolysis (15). Other molecules associated with both Th2-driven asthma and hypoxia/HIF include Muc5AC, CXCR4, arginase, and some members of chitinase/Fizz family members (16). Because HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-1β are required for mouse development (17), homozygous-null germline knockout approaches cannot be used to study the role of these factors in adult mice. In a preliminary study, we reported that heterozygous-null mice partially deficient in HIF-1α were protected from lung eosinophilia in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation (18). Huerta-Yepez (10) used a conditional strategy to circumvent the embryonic lethality of HIF-1β. Conditional deletion refers to the technique whereby a gene of interest can be deleted in a cell-type specific and/or inducible manner. A widely used strategy involves insertion of recognition sites for the Cre recombinase flanking a crucial part of the targeted gene of interest. These recognition sites (referred to as lox P sites) are bound by Cre, which excises the intervening genetic segments and recombines the free ends of DNA. Two general approaches can then be used to conditionally delete genes of interest. First, by breeding mice with targeted lox P sites (referred to as ‘floxed’) to separate transgenic strains in which Cre expression is regulated by tissue-specific promoters, deletion of the targeted gene can be restricted to specific cell types. Second, transgenic mice in which Cre expression can be induced pharmacologically can be used to study acute effects of gene deletion. Both of these conditional deletion strategies can circumvent embryonic lethality of genes that are required during development and provide insights into their roles in adult mice. For example, Johnson and colleagues used lysozyme promoter-driven Cre to conditionally delete HIF-1α in neutrophils and monocytes and observed profoundly reduced tissue injury in mouse models of cutaneous inflammation and arthritis (19). Interestingly, there was defective expression of HIF-1 target genes encoding VEGF and glycolytic enzymes in HIF-1α-null macrophages studied ex vivo even under nonhypoxic conditions. Whereas deletion of HIF-1α abrogated leukocyte influx, VEGF deletion impaired tissue edema without affecting inflammation. This paper established that HIF-1α was essential for myeloid-driven inflammation in a VEGF-independent manner. A more recent study reported that HIF-2α is preferentially induced by Th2 cytokines in myeloid cells and contributes to alternative macrophage activation (7). Huerta-Yepez et al. used an inducible deletion strategy to study the role of HIF-1β in allergic airway inflammation. This involved breeding floxed HIF-1β mice (referred to as ArntF/F mice) with mice expressing Cre under the control of the Mx-1 promoter. Mx1 is involved in innate anti-viral defenses and is highly inducible by type I interferons. By injecting mice with the double-stranded RNA polyI:C, which leads to robust type I IFN production, Huerta-Yepez et al. were able to induce widespread deletion of HIF-1β in multiple cell types. Although immunohistochemical staining indicated prominent baseline expression of HIF-1β in bronchiolar epithelial cells and blood vessels that was significantly reduced following polyI:C injection, it seems likely that HIF-1β was deleted in other cell types as well. It is not possible to distinguish between the roles of HIF-1β during allergen sensitization, allergen challenge, or both from the present study. The observation that HIF-1β deletion–attenuated Ova-specific IgE production suggests that this factor is involved in alum-driven Th2 sensitization, which involves inflammasome-dependent dendritic cell activation. It will be interesting in future studies to dissect the role of HIF family members in pro-allergic innate immune responses in more detail. The authors also showed that in both humans and mice, allergen challenge leads to marked upregulation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression in airway epithelial cells and cells retrieved from nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage. At least some of the HIF-1α expression was localized to the nucleus, indicative of a transcriptionally active HIF-1 complex. As airway epithelial cells are continually exposed to ambient oxygen concentrations, how could the oxygen-sensing mechanism described above become activated in these cells? One possibility is that alternative ‘nonhypoxic’ modes of HIF-1α activation operate in these cells, which is a ripe area for future research. It is worth noting that mouse models of chemical colitis have uncovered a protective role for HIF-1 in promoting intestinal epithelial barrier integrity (20), whereas HIF-1 plays a pathogenic role in promoting lung inflammation in a mouse model of trauma/hemorrhagic shock (21). It will be important in future studies to define the precise role of different HIF family members in the airway epithelium (e.g. with epithelial-specific conditional deletion), as well as in different inflammatory cell types (e.g. dendritic cells and lymphocyte subsets). It is quite possible that HIF-1α may have protective effects in some contexts. For example, chimeric mice with complete loss of HIF-1α in lymphocytes manifest autoimmunity, suggesting a role for HIF-1 in downregulating immune responses (22). Future studies investigating the potential association of HIFs with redox homeostasis and mitochondrial metabolism in the allergic airway may also prove worthwhile (23). In summary, the identification of HIF-1 as a transcription factor involved in allergic airway inflammation is an important advance. Future studies of this oxygen-sensing pathway in different cells types and human subjects with asthma should enhance our understanding of asthma pathophysiology. The clinical development of HIF antagonists may also open new doors for therapeutic intervention. TR and GLS edited and revised the manuscript, SNG wrote the first and final drafts. None of the authors has a conflict of interest with the topic of the editorial.
This issue of the JCI contains the first articles in a Perspective series that focuses on ischemia, the major cause of mortality in the developed world. The specific mechanisms and consequences of ischemia differ in each tissue or organ, which reflects differences in anatomy and physiology. For this reason, the series has been organized to include articles on cerebral (Dennis Choi and colleagues), myocardial (Sandy Williams and Ivor Benjamin), and skeletal muscle (Jeff Isner) ischemia, as well as discussions of ischemia in epithelial tissues (Sanjay Nigam and colleagues) and hypoxia-induced pulmonary vascular remodeling (Norbert Voelkel and Rubin Tuder). In each case, the authors present a balanced overview of the field and focus on an area of particular interest, such as the contribution of excitatory neurotransmitter release to the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction, the protective effect of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in myocardial ischemia, the role of VEGF in ischemia-induced angiogenesis, the disruptive effects of ischemia on epithelial barrier function, or the effects of hypoxia on pulmonary vascular biology. Most of the research discussed employs tissue culture or small animal model systems and reflects the expectation that insights into basic pathophysiology will offer a foundation for designing therapeutics. Despite the variability of responses to ischemia in various tissues, several general therapeutic strategies can be considered regardless of the anatomical site of ischemia. Ischemia arises when tissue demand for energy substrates (primarily O2 and glucose) is not matched by supply, usually due to impaired perfusion. Thus, ischemia can be prevented or eliminated, in principle, by decreasing demand or increasing supply. As discussed by Williams and Benjamin, decreased demand occurs in the case of hibernating myocardium, in which the ATP-consuming process of contractility is inhibited to minimize O2 and glucose consumption. Global inhibition of myocardial or cerebral function is unlikely to represent a viable therapeutic strategy, but the alternative of increasing supply to these tissues seems feasible, for example, by therapeutic angiogenesis (see Perspective by Isner). DNA- or protein-based clinical trials involving VEGF, other angiogenic factors, or mediators of their production are currently underway. Another approach is to prevent the death of ischemic tissue, i.e., infarction. A major focus of investigation has been the preconditioning phenomena that have been demonstrated in virtually every organ, including the heart and brain. Thus, exposure of an organ or tissue to one or more brief episodes of ischemia will provide protection against subsequent prolonged ischemia that would otherwise result in infarction. The preconditioning stimulus provides an immediate but short-lived “first window” of protection, which occurs over a period of minutes to hours and requires the altered activity of pre-existing proteins, as well as a delayed but sustained “second window” of protection, which persists over a period of hours to days and depends on new protein synthesis. Considerable progress has been made in elucidating the signal transduction pathways that mediate these adaptive responses, as described in the Perspectives by Choi’s group and by Williams and Benjamin. A pharmacologic agent capable of activating a preconditioning pathway would, of course, have tremendous therapeutic potential. A third approach is to target for inhibition or induction a specific gene or protein product that is known to promote ischemia or to protect against infarction. The analysis of knockout and transgenic mice has provided a wealth of data regarding genes that, when inactivated or activated, either promote or protect against cerebral or myocardial infarction. The interpretation of these data, however, is not always entirely straightforward. For example, the Nos2 gene encoding inducible nitric oxide synthase is required for late-phase cardiac preconditioning, but NOS2-deficient mice develop smaller cerebral infarctions than their wild-type littermates in response to cerebral arterial occlusion. Thus, NOS2 may help to protect preconditioned animals and also, paradoxically, promote infarction in non-preconditioned animals. Transgenic models have demonstrated that overexpression of HSPs, such as HSP70, provides protection against ischemia in the myocardium (as described by Williams and Benjamin) and in epithelial tissues (as discussed by Nigam and colleagues). Examples of potentially useful pharmacologic inhibitors have come from animal models of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension, in which treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or endothelin receptor ETA antagonists can prevent or reverse vascular remodeling. However, as Voelkel and Tuder explain, it is not entirely clear to which clinical conditions the rodent model is relevant. The present Perspective series on ischemia has notable parallels to the excellent JCI Perspective series on cancer therapy that was recently edited by Bill Kaelin (December 1999–January 2000). For both ischemic and neoplastic disorders, we are accumulating an impressive fund of knowledge regarding pathophysiology. Although the articles in the present series on ischemia demonstrate the enormous complexity of the disease processes under investigation, the challenge to each investigator and reader of the JCI remains to build this growing investment into clinical dividends, in the form of novel and effective therapeutics.
The role of hypoxia as a key determinant of outcome for human cancers has encouraged efforts to noninvasively detect and localize regions of poor oxygenation in tumors. In this review, we will summarize existing and developing techniques for imaging tumoral hypoxia. A brief review of the biology of tumor oxygenation and its effect on tumor cells will be provided initially. We will then describe existing methods for measurement of tissue oxygenation status. An overview of emerging molecular imaging techniques based on radiolabeled hypoxic markers such as misonidazole or hypoxia-related genes and proteins will then be given, and the usefulness of these approaches toward targeting hypoxia directly will be assessed. Finally, we will evaluate the clinical potential of oxygen- and molecular-specific techniques for imaging hypoxia, and discuss how these methods will individually and collectively advance oncology.
Cardiac function is required for blood circulation and systemic oxygen delivery. However, the heart has intrinsic oxygen demands that must be met to maintain effective contractility. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that functions as a master regulator of oxygen homeostasis in all metazoan species. HIF-1 controls oxygen delivery, by regulating angiogenesis and vascular remodeling, and oxygen utilization, by regulating glucose metabolism and redox homeostasis. Analysis of animal models suggests that by activation of these homeostatic mechanisms, HIF-1 plays a critical protective role in the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease and pressure-overload heart failure.
Abstract Transcription factors are trans-acting proteins that affect the rate of transcription by specific interactions with DNA and/or other proteins (see Chapter 1). Transcriptional activators and repressors have positive and negative effects, respectively, on the rate of transcription. Transcriptional regulators may affect the rate of transcription initiation and/or mRNA elongation. In addition to DNA-binding activators and repressors, a variety of coactivators, corepressors, and other cofactors have been identified that do not bind to DNA directly but instead interact with the DNA-binding proteins and mediate their effects on transcription. Some of these co-factors have enzymatic activities that allow them to modify other cofactors, Pol II, or histones. Each of the transcription factor classes listed in Table 3.1 will be described in this chapter, followed by a discussion of pathways that transduce signals (e.g., cytokines, growth fac tors, and small molecules) at the cell surface to transcription factors that alter gene expression in the nucleus.
Gli esseri umani hanno sviluppato un complesso sist ema circolatorio, respiratorio e neuroendocrino per garantire che il livello di ossi geno sia accuratamente preservato, poiche un eccesso o un'insufficienza possono portare alla morte di cellule, tessuti o dell'organismo. Come discusso di seguito, l'omeostasi dell'ossigeno rappresenta un principio organizzativo per comprendere l'evoluzione, lo sviluppo, la fisio logia e la malattia. Storicamente, la rilevazione di ossigeno era considerata limitata a cellule specializzate, come le cellule glomiche del corpo carotideo, che depolarizzano in millisecondi in risposta all'ipossemia per mezzo di meccanismi non completamente conosciuti. 2 Riconosciamo ora che tutte le cellule nucleate del corpo percepiscono e rispondon o all'ipossia. In condizioni di ridotta disponibilita di ossigeno, il fattore 1 indotto dal l'ipossia (HIF-1) regola l'espressione dei geni che mediano le risposte adattive. 3-6 Nelle cellule ipossiche la trascrizione di diverse centinaia di RNA messaggeri (mRNA) e aumentata e l'espressione di un numero uguale di mRNA e diminuita. I cambiamenti dipendono in entrambi i casi da HIF-1, ma il legame HIF-1 viene rilevato solo in geni con un'aumentata espressione. L'HIF-1 diminuisce l'espressione mRNA indirettamente regolando i repressori trascrizionali e i microRNA. 3-6 HIF-1 e stata identificato per la prima volta nelle cellule umane come regolatore dell'eritropoietina, l'ormone che controlla la prod uzione di globuli rossi; fattore di crescita dell'endotelio vascolare (VEGF), che stimola l'angi ogenesi; ed enzimi glicolitici, che adattano il metabolismo cellulare alle condizioni i possiche (fig. 1A). 6 L'HIF-1 e composto da una sottounita HIF-1β costitutivamente espressa e da una sottounita HIF- 1α ossigenoregolata. 7 In condizioni aerobiche, l'HIF-1α e idrossilata da proteine prolil idrossilasidominio (PHD), che utilizzano l'ossigeno e l' α-chetoglutarato come substrato e contengono Fe 2+ nel loro centro catalitico. 8 L'HIF-1α idrossilato interagisce con la proteina Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), sottounita di riconoscimento del substrato di una ligasi ubiquitinaproteina che attacca l'HIF-1α per la degradazione proteosomale (fig. 1B). In con dizioni ipossiche, l'idrossilazione e inibita e l' HIF-1α si accumula. L'attivita trascrizionale di HIF-1 e regolata dal fattore di inibizione di HIF-1 (FIH- 1), un asparaginil-idrossilasi che blocca l'interazione di HIF-1α con la proteina coattivatrice p300.