413 publications from this institution
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 191:153-161 (1999) - doi:10.3354/meps191153 Susceptibility of invertebrate larvae to predators: how common are post-capture larval defenses? Stephan G. Bullard1,*, Niels L. Lindquist1, Mark E. Hay2 1University of North Carolina, Institute of Marine Sciences, 3431 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, USA 2School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, USA *E-mail: sbullard@email.unc.edu ABSTRACT: Predation is believed to be a major source of mortality for larvae of benthic invertebrates, but the palatability of larvae commonly found in the water column has rarely been assessed. Larval palatability assays were conducted by collecting live invertebrate larvae from a temperate field site and offering them to a suite of common predators (the fishes Lagodon rhomboides, Leiostomus xanthurus, and Monacanthus hispidus and the hard coral Oculina arbuscula). By crushing larvae that were rejected intact and re-offering them to predators, it was possible to distinguish between defenses based on morphological and chemical characteristics of the larvae. Additionally, abundance data were collected for taxonomic groups of larvae at our sampling location. The majority of invertebrate larvae were palatable to consumers. Most predators readily consumed polychaete larvae, barnacle nauplii, bivalve veligers, shrimp zoeae, crab megalopae, phoronid actinotrochs, and hemichordate tornaria (which together accounted for 65% of meroplankton abundance), suggesting that these larvae lacked effective morphological or chemical defenses. Against at least 1 fish predator, a significant number of gastropod veligers, barnacle cyprids, crab zoeae, and stomatopod larvae (which accounted for 34% of meroplankton abundance) appeared to be morphologically defended. Larvae from these groups tended to be rejected whole, but were consumed by fishes once they were crushed. A significant number of nemertean pilidia, asteroid bipinnaria, and cnidarian planulae (which accounted for only 0.2% of meroplankton abundance) were rejected both whole and crushed, suggesting that some species or individuals within these taxa may be chemically defended. Thus, the majority of larvae from this assemblage of temperate meroplankton lacked physical or chemical defenses against potential predators (3 fishes and 1 cnidarian). Among the remaining larvae, physical resistance to predators was much more common than chemical resistance. KEY WORDS: Invertebrate larvae · Chemical ecology · Morphological defense · Predator-prey Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 191. Publication date: December 30, 1999 Print ISSN:0171-8630; Online ISSN:1616-1599 Copyright © 1999 Inter-Research.
The unanticipated impacts of consumers in fragmented habitats are frequently a challenge for ecosystem management. On Indo-Pacific coral reefs, crown-of-thorns sea stars (Acanthaster spp.) are coral predators whose outbreaks cause precipitous coral decline. Across large spatial scales, Acanthaster densities are lower in large no-take Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and reefs subject to limited human exploitation. However, using a combination of observational and manipulative experiments, we found that Acanthaster densities within a network of small, no-take MPAs on reef flats in Fiji were ~2-3.4 times greater inside MPAs than in adjacent fished areas and ~2-2.5 times greater than the upper threshold density indicative of an outbreak. This appeared to result from selective Acanthaster migration to the coral-rich MPAs from fished areas that are coral-poor and dominated by macroalgae. Small MPAs can dramatically increase the cover of foundation species like corals, but may selectively attract coral predators like Acanthaster due to greater food densities within MPAs or because the MPAs are too small to support Acanthaster enemies. As coral cover increases, their chemical and visual cues may concentrate Acanthaster to outbreak densities that cause coral demise, compromising the value of small MPAs. An understanding of predator dynamics as a function of habitat type, size, and fragmentation needs to be incorporated into MPA design and management.
Callophycoic acids A-H (1-8) and callophycols A and B (9 and 10) were isolated from extracts of the Fijian red alga Callophycus serratus, and identified by NMR, X-ray, and mass spectral analyses. These natural products represent four novel carbon skeletons, providing the first examples of diterpene-benzoic acids and diterpene-phenols in macroalgae. Compounds 1-10 exhibited antibacterial, antimalarial, and anticancer activity, although they are less bioactive than diterpene-benzoate macrolides previously isolated from this red alga.
Tropical reefs are in global decline with seaweeds commonly replacing corals. Negative associations between macroalgae and corals are well documented, but the mechanisms involved, the dynamics of the interactions, and variance in effects of different macroalgal-coral pairings are poorly investigated. We assessed the frequency, magnitude, and dynamics of macroalgal-coral competition involving allelopathic and non-allelopathic macroalgae on three, spatially grouped pairs of no-take Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and non-MPAs in Fiji. In non-MPAs, biomass of herbivorous fishes was 70-80% lower, macroalgal cover 4-9 fold higher, macroalgal-coral contacts 5-15 fold more frequent and 23-67 fold more extensive (measured as % of colony margin contacted by macroalgae), and coral cover 51-68% lower than in MPAs. Coral contacts with allelopathic macroalgae occurred less frequently than expected by chance across all sites, while contact with non-allelopathic macroalgae tended to occur more frequently than expected. Transplants of allelopathic macroalgae (Chlorodesmis fastigiata and Galaxaura filamentosa) against coral edges inflicted damage to Acropora aspera and Pocillopora damicornis more rapidly and extensively than to Porites cylindrica and Porites lobata, which appeared more resistant to these macroalgae. Montipora digitata experienced intermediate damage. Extent of damage from macroalgal contact was independent of coral colony size for each of the 10 macroalgal-coral pairings we established. When natural contacts with Galaxaura filamentosa were removed in the field, recovery was rapid for Porites lobata, but Pocillopora damicornis did not recover and damage continued to expand. As macroalgae increase on overfished tropical reefs, allelopathy could produce feedbacks that suppress coral resilience, prevent coral recovery, and promote the stability of algal beds in habitats previously available to corals.
Marine worms are speciose and numerically prominent members of marine communities where they play critical roles in trophic interactions and in affecting biogeochemical cycles. Despite the ecological importance of this group, little is known about their palatability to, and defenses against, consumers. In addition, most studies of prey defenses in marine organisms have focused on overt, sessile species: few studies have investigated more mobile and behaviorally complex species that could potentially be integrating predator deterrents with refuge use and other escape behaviors. To increase our understanding of consequences of defensive traits among mobile marine prey, we surveyed the palatability of 81 species of worms from the Caribbean and warm-temperate western Atlantic. Thirty-seven percent of the species were unpalatable. Worms with differentially exposed body portions commonly defended exposed feeding appendages with chemical or structural deterrents, while palatable and undefended bodies remained sheltered within structural refuges. Unpalatable worms tended to be brightly colored and sedentary, exposed to epibenthic predators, and to occupy hard substrates. Palatable worms tended to be drab, to live in structural refuges from consumers, to be mobile, and to inhabit unconsolidated sediments. Overall, taxonomy (Sabellidae and Terebellidae) and color were the traits most strongly associated with unpalatability. Unpalatable species appeared less constrained by predation and freer to forage for long periods on higher quality surface sediments or on other invertebrates at the sediment surface (thus, potentially influencing the distribution and abundance of other species). In contrast, palatable species appeared more constrained by predation risk. They fed on lower quality subsurface sediments and foraged at times or locations where consumers were less active. These ecological patterns may be generalized to other soft-bodied prey, such as caterpillars, which show similar trends regarding palatability and lifestyle.
Many intertidal seaweeds show a tremendous gradient of morphological form ranging from spatially separated thalli, to thalli that are aggregated into dense turfs. Aggregation of seaweeds into turfs decreases productivity per g organic weight due to crowding of thalli but increases resistance to desiccation. The intertidal distribution of the turf growth form is correlated with the intensity of desiccation stress. Also turfs transplanted into tide pools developed the non-turf morphology, while non-turfs transplanted to emergent substrate either developed the turf form or died. The turf growth form is energetically expensive; apparent productivity of turfs was 23 to 48 % less than that of individuals. Increasing light and nutrients available to turfs by separating the thalli increased apparent productivity by 36 to 113 %. We tested the hypothesis that these turfs minimize energetic costs of this aggregated growth form through the spatial partitioning of photosynthetic and respirative activity. The lower portions of turfs showed less apparent photosynthesis than the upper portions (reductions of 37 to 85 %); however, this spatial partitioning was also found in the individual forms (37 to 63 % reductions) of these relatively simple seaweeds. Spatial differentiation of respiration was similar in turfs and nonturfs. The seaweeds, examined are able to alter the extent of thalli compaction in accordance with varying levels of environmental stress. This phenotypic plasticity allows seaweeds to adopt morphological features that maximize fitness in a wide variety of habitats without being developmentally committed.
As coral reefs face accelerating threats at global scales, examining how different coral species respond to local disruption from top-down and bottom-up forces can inform management at local scales. This may provide additional time for reducing global stressors. We conducted a full factorial experiment examining the effects of corallivory, herbivory, and fertilizer addition on 2 corals: Acropora pulchra and Porites rus , the former of which is faster-growing but more susceptible to predation, disease, and heat-induced mortality. Fertilizer addition enhanced corallivory but did not affect net coral growth. Consumer exclusion enhanced the net growth of A. pulchra by 18.1 times regardless of fertilizer treatment, while the net growth of P. rus did not differ among caging and fertilizer treatments. A. pulchra was rarely overgrown by algae regardless of treatment, while herbivore exclusion and fertilizer enrichment produced opposing effects on overgrowth of P. rus . In uncaged treatments, fertilizer enrichment led to greater herbivory but also 1.8 times greater algal overgrowth of P. rus relative to unfertilized treatments. However, in caged treatments, algal overgrowth of P. rus was 1.9 times higher in unfertilized versus fertilized treatments. Our results suggest that interactions between corallivory, herbivory, and fertilizer enrichment can have alternative effects on different coral species, with a hardier coral experiencing more negative impacts of fertilizer enrichment than a more sensitive coral, which was, in turn, more strongly suppressed by predation. Local stressors that disrupt top-down and bottom-up processes may increase the vulnerability of even the most robust corals, and it is these corals that have been predicted to become more common under future ocean scenarios.
