Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials — Don van Ravenzwaaij (2019) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials
Article
2019
en
Authors
DR
Don van Ravenzwaaij
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Preprint
2019
True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials
Don van Ravenzwaaij
,
John P A Ioannidis
Preprint
2018
True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials
Don van Ravenzwaaij
,
John P A Ioannidis
Preprint
2019
True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials
Don van Ravenzwaaij
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2011
Controlling false positive rates in mass-multivariate tests for electromagnetic responses
Gareth R. Barnes
,
Vladimir Litvak
,
Matthew J. Brookes
,
Karl Friston
Article
2017
Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials
Joshua D. Wallach
,
Patrick G. Sullivan
,
John F. Trepanowski
,
Kristin L. Sainani
,
Ewout W. Steyerberg
,
John P A Ioannidis
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.