Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials — Joshua D. Wallach (2017) | RDL Network
Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials
Article 2017 en
Authors
JW
Joshua D. Wallach
PS
Patrick G. Sullivan
JT
John F. Trepanowski
Abstract
1 min read
A minority of subgroup claims made in the abstracts of RCTs are supported by their own data (ie, a significant interaction effect). For those that have statistical support (P < .05 from an interaction test), most fail to meet other best practices for subgroup tests, including prespecification, stratified randomization, and adjustment for multiple testing. Attempts to corroborate statistically significant subgroup differences are rare; when done, the initially observed subgroup differences are not reproduced.
Lum Kastrati, Sara Farina, Angelica Valz Gris, Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi, Erand Llanaj, Hugo G. Quezada‐Pinedo, Lia Bally, Taulant Muka, John P A Ioannidis
Lum Kastrati, Sara Farina, Angelica Valz Gris, Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi, Erand Llanaj, Hugo G. Quezada‐Pinedo, Lia Bally, Taulant Muka, John P A Ioannidis
Despina G. Contopoulos‐Ioannidis, Iva Seto, Michele P Hamm, Denise Thomson, Lisa Hartling, John P A Ioannidis, Sarah Curtis, Evelyn Constantin, Gitanjali Batmanabane, Terry P. Klassen, Katrina Williams
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.