Table 2, Credibility of the checklists to assess quality of observational studies (evaluation by participating experts)

Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane; Mohammed T Ansari; Gowri Raman; Nancy D Berkman; Mark D Grant; Gail Janes; Margaret Maglione; David Moher; Mona Nasser; Karen A. Robinson; Jodi B Segal; Sophia Tsouros

Back

Table 2, Credibility of the checklists to assess quality of observational studies (evaluation by participating experts)

Article 2011 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2011

Figure 2, Criteria evaluation by the participating experts

Tatyana Shamliyan, Robert L Kane, Mohammed Ansari, Gowri Raman, Nancy D Berkman, Mark D Grant, Gail Janes, Margaret Maglione, David Moher, Mona Nasser, Karen A. Robinson, Jodi B Segal, Sophia Tsouros

Article2009

Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings

Georgia Salanti, John P A Ioannidis

Letter2020

Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 2: Using credibility ceilings to explore skepticism about observational evidence

John P A Ioannidis

Article2008

Effect of Formal Statistical Significance on the Credibility of Observational Associations

John P A Ioannidis

Article2007

Complementary Approaches to Assess the Environmental Quality of Estuarine Sediments

Nuria Fernández, Juan Bellas, José Ignacio Lorenzo Lizalde, Ricardo Beiras