Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 2: Using credibility ceilings to explore skepticism about observational evidence

John P A Ioannidis

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.004

Back

Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 2: Using credibility ceilings to explore skepticism about observational evidence

Letter 2020 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Letter2020

Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 4: Credibility ceilings da capo

John P A Ioannidis

Article2011

Table 2, Credibility of the checklists to assess quality of observational studies (evaluation by participating experts)

Tatyana Shamliyan, Robert L Kane, Mohammed T Ansari, Gowri Raman, Nancy D Berkman, Mark D Grant, Gail Janes, Margaret Maglione, David Moher, Mona Nasser, Karen A. Robinson, Jodi B Segal, Sophia Tsouros

Article2018

Treating insomnia and depression: using network analysis to explore working mechanisms

Tessa F. Blanken, Tanja van der Zweerde, Annemieke van Straten, Eus J.W. Van Someren, Denny Borsboom, Jaap Lancee

Article2018

Treating insomnia and depression: using network analysis to explore working mechanisms

Tessa F. Blanken, Tanja van der Zweerde, Annemieke van Straten, Eus J.W. Van Someren, Denny Borsboom, Jaap Lancee

Article2004

Using the Electron Microscope to Explore Reliability in Microelectromechanical Systems and Nanostructured Materials

Eric A. Stach, V. Gopal, Miao Jin, Daan Hein Alsem, Mark J. Williamson, Andrew M. Minor, Velimir Radmilović, Christopher L. Muhlstein, J.W. Morris, Robert O. Ritchie

Microscopy and Microanalysis