Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey
Article 2023 en
Authors
PN
Phi‐Yen Nguyen
JM
Joanne E. McKenzie
DH
Daniel G. Hamilton
Abstract
1 min read
Certain types of review materials were considered unnecessary for sharing, despite their importance to the review's transparency and reproducibility. Structural barriers and concerns about negative consequences hinder data sharing among systematic reviewers. Normalization and institutional incentives are essential to promote data-sharing practices in evidence-synthesis research.
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Joanne E. McKenzie, Daniel G. Hamilton, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Fiona Fidler, Neal Haddaway, Julian P. T. Higgins, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, Steve McDonald, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page
Farhad Shokraneh, Clive E Adams, Mike Clarke, Laura Amato, Hilda Bastian, Elaine Beller, Jon Brassey, Rachelle Buchbinder, Marina Davoli, Chris Del Mar, Paul Glasziou, Christian Gluud, Carl Heneghan, Tammy Hoffmann, John P A Ioannidis, Mahesh Jayaram, Joey S.W. Kwong, David Moher, Erika Ota, Rebecca Syed Sheriff, Luke Vale, Ben Goldacre
Jeremy Y. Ng, Daivat Bhavsar, Neha Dhanvanthry, L.M. Bouter, Teresa M. Chan, Annette Flanagin, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher, Holger Cramer
.webp){kind=small}
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.