Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey

Phi‐Yen Nguyen; Joanne E. McKenzie; Daniel G. Hamilton; David Moher; Peter Tugwell; Fiona Fidler; Neal Haddaway; Julian P. T. Higgins; Raju Kanukula; Sathya Karunananthan; Lara Maxwell; Steve McDonald; Shinichi Nakagawa; David Nunan; Vivian Welch; Matthew J. Page

doi:10.1002/cesm.12009

Abstract

1 min read

Reviewers have various perceptions of what constitutes a replication of SRs. Reviewers see replication as important and valuable but perceive several barriers to conducting replications. Institutional support should be better communicated to reviewers to address these perceptions.

Related publications

Article2023

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey

Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Joanne E. McKenzie, Daniel G. Hamilton, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Fiona Fidler, Neal Haddaway, Julian P. T. Higgins, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, Steve McDonald, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page

Article2015

How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?

Alexander Tsertsvadze, Yen‐Fu Chen, David Moher, Paul Sutcliffe, Noel McCarthy

Article2008

Issues related to the conduct of systematic reviews: a focus on the nutrition field

David Moher, Andrea C. Tricco

Preprint2023

Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research: a cross-sectional international survey

Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, Robert T. Thibault, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Farah Abu-Dalfa, David Moher

Preprint2025

Evaluation of the replicability of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of the effects of health interventions

Daniel G. Hamilton, Joanne E. McKenzie, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Steve McDonald, Sue Brennan, Fiona Fidler, Julian P. T. Higgins, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page