Supporting Patients with Cancer after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Article 2025 en
Authors
FO
Frans L. Opdam
BM
Beverly Moy
EC
Edwin Choy
Abstract
1 min read
In the context of cancer, whether or not to choose pregnancy termination represents a difficult and multifaceted decision. In this editorial, members of The Oncologist editorial team attempt to contextualize the potential implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization for patients with cancer.
Andrew G. Shuman, Matti Aapro, Benjamin O. Anderson, Katherine Arbour, Pedro C. Barata, Aditya Bardia, Éduardo Bruera, Bruce A. Chabner, Herbert Chen, Edwin Choy, Pierfranco Conté, Giuseppe Curigliano, Don S. Dizon, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Antonio Tito Fojo, Hans Gelderblom, Timothy A. Graubert, Jayne Gurtler, Evan Hall, Fred R. Hirsch, Ahmed Idbaïh, David H. Ilson, Michael J. Kelley, Carlo La Vecchia, Heinz Ludwig, Beverly Moy, Hyman B. Muss, Frans L. Opdam, Rebecca D. Pentz, Marshall R. Posner, Jeffrey S. Ross, Adrian G. Sacher, Suresh Senan, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Kenneth K. Tanabe, Jan B. Vermorken, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, Susan E. Bates
Tereza Vaclová, Nicholas T. Woods, Fernando Setién, José María García Bueno, José A. Macías, Alicia Barroso, Miguel Urioste, Manel Esteller, Álvaro N.A. Monteiro, Javier Benı́tez, Ana Osório
Ciara Conduit, Andrisha–Jade Inderjeeth, R.J. Allen, Andrew Martin, Wendy R. Parulekar, Eibhlin Mulroe, Margaret McJannett, Robert Zielinski, Alastair Thomson, Thean Hsiang Tan, Shahneen Sandhu, M. Neil Reaume, David Pook, Scott North, Gavin Marx, Anthony M. Joshua, Lisa G. Horvath, Ray McDermott, Simon Chowdhury, Kim N., Alison Y. Zhang, Martin R. Stockler,
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.