Supporting Patients with Cancer after <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</i>
Article 2022 en
Authors
AS
Andrew G. Shuman
MA
Matti Aapro
BA
Benjamin O. Anderson
Abstract
1 min read
In the context of cancer, whether or not to choose pregnancy termination represents a difficult and multifaceted decision. In this editorial, members of The Oncologist editorial team attempt to contextualize the potential implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizationfor patients with cancer.
Frans L. Opdam, Beverly Moy, Edwin Choy, Andrew G. Shuman, Hans Gelderblom, Pedro C. Barata, Giuseppe Curigliano, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, David H. Ilson, Rebecca D. Pentz, Heinz Ludwig, Suresh Senan, Jeffrey S. Ross, Timothy A. Graubert, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Aditya Bardia, Katherine Arbour, Pierfranco Conté, Fred R. Hirsch, Herbert Chen, Jayne Gurtler, Hyman B. Muss, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Bruce A. Chabner, Benjamin O. Anderson, Antonio Tito Fojo, Evan Hall, Susan E. Bates, Michael J. Kelley, Jan B. Vermorken, Marshall R. Posner, Ahmed Idbaïh, Don S. Dizon, Carlo La Vecchia, Matti Aapro, Adrian G. Sacher, Kenneth K. Tanabe, Éduardo Bruera
Tereza Vaclová, Nicholas T. Woods, Fernando Setién, José María García Bueno, José A. Macías, Alicia Barroso, Miguel Urioste, Manel Esteller, Álvaro N.A. Monteiro, Javier Benı́tez, Ana Osório
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.