Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Spin, Bias, and Clinical Utility in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies — John P A Ioannidis (2020) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Spin, Bias, and Clinical Utility in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Spin, Bias, and Clinical Utility in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies
Article
2020
en
Related publications
Article
2008
Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review
Andrea C. Tricco
,
Jennifer Tetzlaff
,
Margaret Sampson
,
Dean Fergusson
,
Elise Cogo
,
Tanya Horsley
,
David Moher
Article
2020
Empirical assessment of bias in machine learning diagnostic test accuracy studies
Ryan Crowley
,
,
Authors
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Yuan Tan
John P A Ioannidis
Editorial Material
2019
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Trevor A. McGrath
,
David Moher
,
Matthew D. F. McInnes
Article
2017
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Trevor A. McGrath
,
Mostafa Alabousi
,
Becky Skidmore
,
Daniël A. Korevaar
,
Patrick M. Bossuyt
,
David Moher
,
Brett D. Thombs
,
Matthew D. F. McInnes
Corrigendum
2017
Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people
Susan D. Shenkin
,
Jennifer Harrison
,
Tim Wilkinson
,
Richard Dodds
,
John P A Ioannidis
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.