Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) — Trevor A. McGrath (2019) | RDL Network
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting standards in biomedical research have been shown to be suboptimal. The publication of the PRISMA statement has improved the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews, but several issues specific to diagnostic test accuracy are not included in the PRISMA statement. Therefore, a diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA statement, PRISMA-DTA, was created. This commentary addresses completeness of reporting in systematic reviews, the PRISMA-DTA statement, and strategies for optimal uptake of reporting guidelines.
Jean‐Paul Salameh, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Trevor A. McGrath, Brett D. Thombs, Christopher Hyde, Petra Macaskill, Jonathan J Deeks, Mariska Leeflang, Daniël A. Korevaar, Penny Whiting, Yemisi Takwoingi, Johannes B. Reitsma, Jérémie F. Cohen, Robert Frank, Harriet Hunt, Lotty Hooft, Anne WS Rutjes, Brian H Willis, Constantine Gatsonis, Brooke Levis, David Moher, Matthew D. F. McInnes
Matthew D. F. McInnes, David Moher, Brett D. Thombs, Trevor A. McGrath, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Tammy Clifford, Jérémie F. Cohen, Jonathan J Deeks, Constantine Gatsonis, Lotty Hooft, Harriet Hunt, Christopher Hyde, Daniël A. Korevaar, Mariska Leeflang, Petra Macaskill, Johannes B. Reitsma, Rachel Rodin, Anne WS Rutjes, Jean‐Paul Salameh, Adrienne Stevens, Yemisi Takwoingi, Marcello Tonelli, Laura Weeks,
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.