Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

Matthew J. Page; Douglas G. Altman; Larissa Shamseer; Joanne E. McKenzie; Nadera Ahmadzai; Dianna Wolfe; Fatemeh Yazdi; Ferrán Catalá-López; Andrea C. Tricco; David Moher

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017

Back

Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

Article 2017 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2023

Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluations

Ferrán Catalá-López, Manuel Ridao-López, Laura Tejedor-Romero, Lisa Caulley, Brian Hutton, Don Husereau, Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo, Enrique Bernal‐Delgado, Michael Drummond, David Moher

Article2016

Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature

Shareen A. Iqbal, Joshua D. Wallach, Muin J. Khoury, Sheri D. Schully, John P A Ioannidis

Article2018

Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017

Joshua D. Wallach, Kevin W. Boyack, John P A Ioannidis

Article2025

Reproducibility of meta-analytic results in systematic reviews of interventions: meta-research study

Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Joanne E. McKenzie, Zainab Alqaidoom, Daniel G. Hamilton, David Moher, Matthew J. Page

Editorial Material2018

Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure

Morten Hylander Møller, John P A Ioannidis, Michaël Darmon