Reproducibility of meta-analytic results in systematic reviews of interventions: meta-research study
Article 2025 en
Authors
PN
Phi‐Yen Nguyen
JM
Joanne E. McKenzie
ZA
Zainab Alqaidoom
Abstract
1 min read
The findings of the study suggested that the results of meta-analyses could be reliably replicated if the original data or analytic code, or both, could be obtained, or if the necessary data were accessible in the review. Few systematic reviewers responded to requests to share data or code. Making data files and analytic code publicly available will facilitate future investigations of reproducibility.
Matthew J. Page, David Moher, Fiona Fidler, Julian P. T. Higgins, Sue Brennan, Neal Haddaway, Daniel G. Hamilton, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, Steve McDonald, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Joanne E. McKenzie
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Raju Kanukula, Joanne E. McKenzie, Zainab Alqaidoom, Sue Brennan, Neal Haddaway, Daniel G. Hamilton, Sathya Karunananthan, Steve McDonald, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page
Daniel G. Hamilton, Joanne E. McKenzie, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Steve McDonald, Sue Brennan, Fiona Fidler, Julian P. T. Higgins, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.