Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies.

David Moher; Howard Schachter

Back

Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies.

Article 2002 en

Abstract

1 min read

Systematic reviews are useful tools because they combine the efficacy results of individual studies and provide health care providers and others with a picture of the overall impact of an intervention. Resources exist to help ensure that appropriate methods are used to conduct and report systematic

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2023

Principles for good scholarship in systematic reviews

Kat Kolaski, Lynne Romeiser Logan, John P A Ioannidis

Article2017

Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people

Susan D. Shenkin, Jennifer Harrison, Tim Wilkinson, Richard Dodds, John P A Ioannidis

Article2009

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P.J. Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher

Article2009

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P.J. Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher

Letter2013

The problem of duplicate systematic reviews

David Moher