Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation
КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА 10(18): 1867-1877
Article 2017 English
Authors
KY
Kyohei Yamaji
SB
Salvatore Brugaletta
MS
Manel Sabaté
Abstract
1 min read
Objectives
This study sought to investigate the effect of post-dilatation on angiographic and intracoronary imaging parameters in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention comparing the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) with the everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES).
Background
Routine post-dilatation of BRS has been suggested to improve post-procedural angiographic and subsequent device-related clinical outcomes.
Methods
In the ABSORB STEMI TROFI II trial, 191 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment with BRS (n = 95) or EES (n = 96). Minimal lumen area and healing score as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 6 months were compared between BRS- and EES-treated patients stratified according to post-dilatation status.
Results
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with post-dilatation was performed in 48 (50.5%) BRS- and 25 (25.5%) EES-treated lesions. There were no differences in baseline characteristics and post-procedural minimal lumen diameter between groups. In the BRS group, lesions with post-dilatation were associated with a trend toward a smaller minimal lumen area at 6 months (5.07 ± 1.68 mm2 vs. 5.72 ± 1.77 mm2; p = 0.09) and significantly larger angiographic late lumen loss (0.28 ± 0.34 mm vs. 0.12 ± 0.25 mm; p = 0.02), whereas no difference was observed in the EES arm (5.46 ± 2.18 mm2 vs. 5.55 ± 1.77 mm2; p = 0.85). The neointimal healing score was low and comparable between groups with and without post-dilation (BRS: 1.55 ± 2.61 vs. 1.92 ± 2.17; p = 0.48; EES: 2.50 ± 3.33 vs. 2.90 ± 4.80; p = 0.72).
Conclusions
In the setting of selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with BRS or EES, post-dilatation did not translate into larger lumen area or improved arterial healing at follow-up. (ABSORB STEMI: The TROFI II; NCT01986803)
Yuki Katagiri, Patrick W. Serruys, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, Taku Asano, Carlos Collet, Yosuke Miyazaki, Athanasios Katsikis, Jan J. Piek, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Bernard Chevalier, Gary S. Mintz, Gregg W. Stone, Yoshinobu Onuma
Pannipa Suwannasom, Yohei Sotomi, Yuki Ishibashi, Rafael Cavalcante, Felipe N. Albuquerque, Carlos Macaya, John A. Ormiston, Jonathan Hill, Iréne Lang, Mohaned Egred, Jean Fajadet, Maciej Lesiak, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Robbert J. de Winter, Bernard Chevalier, Patrick W. Serruys, Yoshinobu Onuma
Salvatore Cassese, Yuki Katagiri, Robert A. Byrne, Salvatore Brugaletta, Fernándo Alfonso, Lorenz Räber, Michael Mæng, Andrés Íñiguez, Еvgeny Kretov, Yoshinobu Onuma, Michael Joner, Manel Sabaté, Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz, Stephan Windecker, Adnan Kastrati, Patrick W. Serruys
Josep Gómez‐Lara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Luis Ortega‐Paz, Bert Vandeloo, Elisabetta Moscarella, M. Abelló Salas, Rafael Romaguera, Gerard Roura, José Luis Ferreiro, Luís Teruel, Montserrat Gracida, Stephan Windecker, Patrick W. Serruys, Joan Antoni Gómez‐Hospital, Manel Sabaté, Ángel Cequier
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.