<p>Engagement at work is a positive mental and dispositional state characterized by Vigor, Dedication and Concentration. The aim of this study was to adapt and get evidence of validity for the Brazilian version of the utrecht work engagement scale (UWES). Participated in the study 1167 workers between 18 and 70 years (M = 36.8, SD = 10.3) in the Brazilian regions. Studies to establish content and construct validity with the 17- item and the 9- item scales were performed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes showed that the best solution is unifactorial. Internal consistency was high. Age differences in engagement were found. The results also indicate that the present version of UWES is valid for use in Brazil and reinforce the idea that engagement at work is a universal construct. Although most of the results agree with the findings reported in the literature, some cultural differences appeared and they are discussed in this paper.</p>
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
: Studies published on the validity of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), a novel burnout instrument, have gained traction in the literature over recent years. The BAT has been successfully shown to be equivalent across representative samples when modeled as a second-order/higher-order model. However, this specification is not free of criticism and the bifactor approach has been presented as the alternative model specification. Therefore, a study investigating the construct-relevant multidimensionality of the BAT across many representative samples is warranted to reassess a global burnout factor ( n = 9,041). We implemented bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to ascertain the relevance of a global burnout factor and specific component factors (bifactor-ESEM). According to the standardized loadings and McDonald’s ω coefficients, the results showed that the bifactor-ESEM model had a strong global burnout factor with relevant specific factors beyond the global factor. The model also showed measurement invariance across countries and genders. We also present a figure that compares the global burnout mean scores of the countries. All in all, the results of this study reaffirmed that BAT-assessed burnout can be modeled with an equivalent global burnout score across conditions.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the main and interaction effects of self-rated promotion and prevention regulatory focus on self-rated work performance, emotional exhaustion and sickness absence for managers and non-managers separately. The authors expected that promotion focus relates positively to performance and negatively to sickness absence, while prevention focus relates positively to exhaustion and sickness absence, both for managers and non-managers. Furthermore, the authors expected that promotion focus relates positively to performance but also to exhaustion and sickness absence when prevention focus is high, only for managers (i.e. a manager’s dual regulatory focus can be an effective but also exhausting leadership strategy). Design/methodology/approach The authors tested the hypotheses via moderated regression analyses among two independent groups, managers ( n =241) and non-managers ( n =415). Findings Promotion focus was positively related to managers’ and non-managers’ performance and negatively to non-managers’ sickness absence, while prevention focus did not have any main effects. As expected, managers’ promotion focus was positively related to managers’ sickness absence when managers’ prevention focus was high (i.e. dual regulatory focus). Furthermore, managers’ promotion focus negatively related to managers’ performance when managers’ prevention was high, failing to support the hypothesis. Practical implications Promotion focus should be enhanced by organizations among leaders and employees. The authors also cautiously discuss the possibility of interventions comparing a promotion focus with dual-focus training. Originality/value The authors contribute to the literature by examining the joint (rather than main) effects of promotion and prevention focus on work behavior and the authors address these links among managers and non-managers.
Background Burnout and work engagement have been viewed as opposite, yet distinct states of employee well-being. We investigated whether work-related indicators of well-being (i.e. burnout and work engagement) spill-over and generalize to context-free well-being (i.e. depressive symptoms and life satisfaction). More specifically, we examined the causal direction: does burnout/work engagement lead to depressive symptoms/life satisfaction, or the other way around? Methods Three surveys were conducted. In 2003, 71% of all Finnish dentists were surveyed (n =3255), and the response rate of the 3-year follow-up was 84% (n =2555). The second follow-up was conducted four years later with a response rate of 86% (n =1964). Structural equation modeling was used to investigate the cross-lagged associations between the study variables across time. Results Burnout predicted depressive symptoms and life dissatisfaction from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3. Conversely, work engagement had a negative effect on depressive symptoms and a positive effect on life satisfaction, both from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3, even after adjusting for the impact of burnout at every occasion. Limitations The study was conducted among one occupational group, which limits its generalizability. Conclusions Work-related well-being predicts general wellbeing in the long-term. For example, burnout predicts depressive symptoms and not vice versa. In addition, burnout and work engagement are not direct opposites. Instead, both have unique, incremental impacts on life satisfaction and depressive symptoms.
No abstract is provided for this article.
espanolEste estudio pone a prueba la estructura factorial del MBI-GS (Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey) y de un inventario sobre ‘engagement’, esto es, el constructo hipotetico ‘opuesto’ al ‘burnout’. Los analisis factoriales confirmatorios realizados con una muestra de 514 trabajadores que utilizan tecnologias de la informacion en sus puestos, corroboran lostres factores esperados del ‘burnout’ (agotamiento, cinismo y reducida eficacia profesional)asi como los tres factores esperados del ‘engagement’ (vigor, dedicacion y absorcion). Losanalisis de regresion multiple jerarquicos adicionales ponen de manifiesto que las escalas de‘engagement’ anaden valor para la prediccion de indicadores de bienestar psicologico subjetivo (compromiso organizacional, satisfaccion laboral y entusiasmo laboral) cuando se controla el ‘burnout’. Finalmente, en este trabajo se analizan las limitaciones del estudio y algunas propuestas de investigacion futuras sobre esta nueva perspectiva. EnglishThis study examines the factorial structures of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Sur-vey (MBI-GS) and of an inventory that assesses engagement, the hypothesized ‘opposite’ of burnout. Confirmatory factor-analyses in a sample of 514 Spanish workers using informationtechnologies in the workplace, corroborated the expected three-factor structure of the MBI(i.e., exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced efficacy) as well as the hypothesized three-factorstructure of engagement (i.e. vigor, dedication, and absorption). Additional hierarchical multiple regression analysis show the added value of the engagement scales to predict indicators of subjective well-being (i.e. organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job enthusiasm) when one controls for burnout. Finally, study limitations and perspectives for future research on burnout and engagement are discussed.