1,592 publications from this institution
No abstract is provided for this article.
Reading the theoretical literature on the burnout syndrome for the past decade, one sometimes gets the impression that what is being looked for is a specific cause of a specific mental disorder. If it has a name, we will find what lies behind it—something akin to a metabolic deficiency or a virus. Could it be role conflict, lack of feedback, an external locus of control, or too much red tape? Correlations between these and burnout measures keep being significant, given adequate sample sizes, but not very impressive numerically. And so the search goes on.
This study examined the associations between workaholism and perceived health (exhaustion, physical complaints, and feelings of professional efficacy) in a sample of 477 Dutch self-employed workers. We defined workaholism as having two components: (1) spending many hours on one's work, and (2) the inability to detach from work. We expected that both workaholism components would be related to ill health. ANOVA and regression analyses revealed that this reasoning was confirmed for one component (inability to detach from work), whereas the other component (working long hours) was unrelated to the outcome variables. In order to increase understanding of these findings, we suggest that more theoretical work be conducted on the mechanisms linking workaholism to its presumed antecedents and consequences. Keywords: Workaholismself-employedentrepreneurseffort expenditurewell-beingburnoutworking hourswork-related stress
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Burnout researchers have proposed that the conceptual opposites of emotional exhaustion and cynicism (the core dimensions of burnout) are vigor and dedication (the core dimensions of engagement), respectively (Maslach & Leiter, 1997; Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Romá, & Bakker, 2002). We tested this proposition by ascertaining whether two sets of items, exhaustion–vigor and cynicism–dedication, were scalable on two distinct underlying bipolar dimensions (i.e., energy and identification, respectively). The results obtained by means of the non-parametric Mokken scaling method in three different samples (Ns=477, 507, and 381) supported our proposal: the core burnout and engagement dimensions can be seen as opposites of each other along two distinct bipolar dimensions dubbed energy and identification.
OBJECTIVE: Despite decades of burnout research, clinical validated cut-off scores that discriminate between those who suffer from burnout and those who don’t are still lacking. To establish such cut-off scores, the current study uses a newly developed questionnaire, the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) that consists of four subscales (exhaustion, mental distancing, and emotional and cognitive impairment). Separate cut-offs were computed for those at risk for burnout and those suffering from severe burnout for the original BAT-23 as well as for the shortened BAT-12. METHODS: Relative operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were carried out using representative samples of healthy employees from The Netherlands (N=1370), Belgium (Flanders; N=1403) and Finland (N=1350). In addition, samples of employees who received a burnout diagnosis were used (N=335, 158 and 50, respectively). RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the BAT (area under the curve) ranges from good to excellent with the exception of mental distancing, which is fair. The country-specific cut-off values as well as their specificity and sensitivity are comparable to those of the pooled sample. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to country-specific cut-offs, general cut-offs can be used tentatively in other similar countries, pending future replication studies. Caution is warranted for using cut-offs for mental distance as the sensitivity and specificity of this subscale is relatively poor. It is concluded that the BAT can be used in organizational surveys for identifying employees at risk for burnout and, in clinical treatment settings, for identifying those with severe burnout, keeping in mind the tentativeness of the present cut-offs.
No abstract is provided for this article.