The major reasons advanced for the retention of crop residues in rainfed systems include increased water infil- tration, reduced evaporation from the soil surface, increased soil organic carbon, reduced soil erosion and ulti- mately the yield of following crops. The residues of crops are valued in various ways in the cropping systems of the dryland regions of the world, including feed for livestock, protection against soil erosion and for maintenance of soil organic matter. Minor uses include building materials, bio-energy production and fuel. Retention of crop resi- dues forms a major part of the system of conservation agriculture along with zero tillage and diverse crop rotation, but retention of crop residues has not been as widely adopted as the other components. This review discusses some of the reasons that crop residues are valued in various agro-ecological environments. It reveals some gaps in knowledge about the short and longer term effects of retaining or removing crop residues and the need to clearly separate the contributions of the components of conservation agriculture. There may be a trade-off be- tween the value of crop residues for livestock feed and the value for soil protection and fertility maintenance. It is suggested that the relative values for different purposes and in a variety of situations requires further elucidation of the impact of residue retention on soil water storage, organic matter content, grain yield increases, and reduction of soil erosion in relation to the potential gains from animal production and survival.
Field experiments were conducted in the eastern wheat belt of Western Australia in a dry year with and without irrigation (1987) and in a wet year (1988), comparing three cultivars of wheat differing in height and yield potential. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of remobilisable stem dry matter to grain dry matter under different water regimes in old and modern wheats. Stem non-structural carbohydrate was labelled with 14C 1 day after anthesis and the activity and weight of this pool and the grain was measured at 2, 18 and 58 days after anthesis. Gutha and Kulin, modern tall and semi-dwarf cultivars respectively, yielded higher than Gamenya, a tall older cultivar in all conditions, but the percentage reduction in yield under water stress was greater for the modern cultivars (41, 34 and 23%). In the grain of Gamenya, the increase in 14C activity after the initial labelling was highest under water stress. Generally, loss of 14C activity from the non-structural stem dry matter was less than the increase in grain activity under water stress but similar to or greater than grain activity increase under well watered conditions. Averaged over environments and cultivars, non-structural dry matter stored in the stem contributed at least 20% of the grain dry matter.