2 publications from this institution
The use of recycled burnt clay brick sand (RBS) and recycled concrete sand (RCS) in historical lime-based repair mortars can reduce the environmental impact caused by construction and demolition waste disposal. This study examined the use of fine recycled concrete and recycled brick aggregates for the production of historical repair mortars using hydraulic lime binder and the influence of the resulting mortars on the performance of historical buildings in reduced scale walls (stacks). Natural-river-sand mortar (NSM) was used as control. Results showed that the recycled-burnt-brick-sand mortar (RBSM) performed better in terms of strength compared to the recycled-concrete sand (RCSM) and the NSM mortars. At the age of 7 and 28 days, the flexural strength of the RBSM and the RCSM was 131% and 44%, respectively, and 300% and 68% above that of the control mortar. The 45-day flexural strength of the NSM and RCSM was similar whilst the RBSM mortar’s strength was 177% higher. The compressive strength followed similar trend. On the other hand, the strength and modulus of elasticity of the stacks were found to be largely influenced by the strength of the brick units.
As the world is witnessing vast pollution during material production, construction and demolition processes of buildings there is a need to seek for alternative materials that will reduce the environmental impact. The present study borrows inspirations from termite's technique to create a material for constructing a naturally cemented mound structure. The studied termite mound was built from a mix of soil particles and termites saliva containing mucopolysaccharides and cellulase enzyme that digests cellulose into beta-glucose or shorter polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. These polysaccharides are found to be a source of soil stabilization and gluing property. In the process to mimic termites' activities clay bricks were produced from a mix of clay soil and cassava flour in a form of hot cassava paste as a source of polysaccharides at 1.5%, 3%, 4.5% and 6% weight of soil. Brick samples created presented an optimal value at 1.5% cassava flour with compressive strength higher than that of burnt clay bricks at 4.28 MPa.
