1,987 publications from this institution
Catriona Diana GOOD Dr1, Ingrid JOHNSRUDE Dr2, John Ashburner3, Karl J. FRISTON4, Richard S. FRACKOWIAK5 1Wellcome Dept of Cognitive Neurolgy, ION, London, UK, UCL, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK, London, UK; 2MRC, ; 3WDCN, Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, UK, London, UK; 4University College London, Institute of Neurology, Wellcome Dept of Cognitive Neurology, London, United Kingdom; 5University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom;
The active inference framework, and in particular its recent formulation as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), has gained increasing popularity in recent years as a useful approach for modeling neurocognitive processes. This framework is highly general and flexible in its ability to be customized to model any cognitive process, as well as simulate predicted neuronal responses based on its accompanying neural process theory. It also affords both simulation experiments for proof of principle and behavioral modeling for empirical studies. However, there are limited resources that explain how to build and run these models in practice, which limits their widespread use. Most introductions assume a technical background in programming, mathematics, and machine learning. In this paper we offer a step-by-step tutorial on how to build POMDPs, run simulations using standard MATLAB routines, and fit these models to empirical data. We assume a minimal background in programming and mathematics, thoroughly explain all equations, and provide exemplar scripts that can be customized for both theoretical and empirical studies. Our goal is to provide the reader with the requisite background knowledge and practical tools to apply active inference to their own research. We also provide optional technical sections and multiple appendices, which offer the interested reader additional technical details. This tutorial should provide the reader with all the tools necessary to use these models and to follow emerging advances in active inference research.
This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) measurements for each of 40 healthy unmedicated participants (20 males and 20 females aged 21.9 +/- 3.8 years) in response to the 16 most arousing negative, and most arousing positive (excluding explicit nude) and 16 least arousing neutral IAPS pictures, presented for 1 s each in 1 block, while listening to regular or random distractor sounds, as described in Bach et al. (2015). ITI was 4 s, plus a variable delay of around 0.4 s for image loading.