We describe the use of anatomically informed basis functions (AIBF) in the analysis of multisubject functional imaging studies.AIBF are used to specify an anatomically informed spatial model that embodies anatomical knowledge for the statistical analysis of neuroimaging data.In a previous communication, we showed how AIBF can be used to incorporate prior anatomical constraints in single subject functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI) analyses to augment their anatomical precision.In this paper, we extend AIBF such that it can be applied to multisubject studies using fMRI or PET.The key concept is that, after spatial normalization, a canonical cortical surface can be used to generate a forward model of signal sources for all subjects.By estimating the hemodynamic signal in this canonical AIBFspace and then projecting it back into the voxel-space, one effectively extracts functional activity that is smooth, within and only within, the cortical sheet while attenuating other components unrelated to the physiological process of interest.The ensuing procedure can be considered as a highly non-stationary, anisotropic anatomically informed [de]convolution or smoothing.It is shown that this procedure offers various advantages compared to existing conventional methods for the analysis of multisubject studies, in particular it is more sensitive to underlying activations.Hum.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article Front. Psychol., 28 May 2012Sec. Perception Science Volume 3 - 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00151
This commentary considers three key themes in the target article, from the perspective of the self-evidencing brain. In brief, I examine the notion of minimal selfhood in terms of inference to the best explanation; in particular, an explanation for sensations that are uniquely available to a self. This begs the question of how self differs from non-self and how non-self differs from the concept of another. From an (active) inference point of view, the building of generative models that entail minimal selfhood rests on structure learning and Bayesian model selection. In this setting, I focus on the role of generalized synchrony – and the implicit closure of action-perception cycles – in dyadic interactions. Finally, I touch on the importance of interoception awareness and the implications of how interoceptive signals are contextualized for translating the ideas in the target article into developmental psychopathology.
Experience–dependent plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex has been demonstrated by electrophysiological experiments in animals. In the present study we used PET neuroimaging to measure regional brain activity in volunteer human subjects during discriminatory classical conditioning of high (8000 Hz) or low (200 Hz) frequency tones by an aversive 100 dB white noise burst. Conditioning–related, frequency–specific modulation of tonotopic neural responses in the auditory cortex was observed. The modulated regions of the auditory cortex positively covaried with activity in the amygdala, basal forebrain and orbitofrontal cortex, and showed context–specific functional interactions with the medial geniculate nucleus. These results accord with animal single–unit data and support neurobiological models of auditory conditioning and value–dependent neural selection.