Publications

Hypertonic sodium lactate (HTL) expands intravascular volume and may provide an alternative substrate for cellular metabolism in sepsis. We compared the effects of HTL, hypertonic saline (HTS), 0.9% ("normal") saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) on hemodynamics, sublingual and renal microcirculation, renal, mesenteric and brain perfusion, renal and cerebral metabolism, and survival in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, adult female sheep. Animals (7 in each group) were randomized to receive a bolus (over 15-min) of 3 mL/kg 0.5 M HTL, 3 mL/kg 3% HTS, 10.8 mL/kg NS, or 10.8 mL/kg RL at 2, 6, and 10 h after induction of fecal peritonitis, followed by 2-h infusions of 1 mL/kg/h (HTL/HTS groups) or 3.6 mL/kg/h (NS/RL groups). Animals also received RL and hydroxyethyl starch (ratio 1:1) titrated to maintain pulmonary artery occlusion pressure at baseline levels throughout the experiment. Animals were observed until their spontaneous death. Fluid balance was lower in the HTL and HTS groups than in the other groups from 4 h. Hemodynamic variables were similar among groups during the first 12 h, but thereafter the HTL group had more pronounced decreases in blood pressure and cardiac function. Sublingual and renal microcirculatory abnormalities occurred earlier in the HTL group. Kidney and brain perfusion decreased more rapidly in the HTL group. Median survival times were significantly shorter in the HTL (17 h) and NS (16 h) groups than in the HTS (22 h) or RL (20 h) groups (P = 0.0029). In conclusion, in an ovine model of septic shock, administration of HTL was associated with earlier onset impaired tissue perfusion and shorter survival time. These observations raise concerns about use of HTL in septic shock.

Abstract Background Exploring clinical trial data using alternative methods may enhance original study’s findings and provide new insights. The SOAP II trial has been published more than 10 years ago; but there is still some speculation that some patients may benefit from dopamine administration for shock management. We aimed to reanalyse the trial under different approaches and evaluate for heterogeneity in treatment effect (HTE). Methods All patients enrolled in SOAP II were eligible for reanalysis. We used a variety of methods including the win-ratio (WR), a Bayesian reanalysis stratified according to shock type, and both a risk-based and effect-based explorations for HTE. The methods were applied to different endpoints, including a hierarchy of death, new use of renal-replacement therapy (RRT), and new-onset arrhythmia; 28-day mortality; a composite endpoint (mortality, new use of RRT, and new-onset arrhythmia), and days alive and free of ICU at 28-days (DAFICU28). Results A total of 1679 patients were included (average age was 64.9 years, 57% male, 62% with septic and 17% with cardiogenic shock). All analysis favoured norepinephrine over dopamine. Under the WR approach, dopamine had fewer wins compared to norepinephrine (WR 0.79; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.68–0.92; p = 0.003), evident in both cardiogenic and septic shock subgroups. The Bayesian reanalysis for type of shock showed, for dopamine, a probability of harm of 0.95 for mortality, > 0.99 probability of harm for composite endpoint, and 0.91 probability of harm for DAFICU28. The fewer DAFICU28 with dopamine was more apparent in those with cardiogenic shock (0.92). Under the risk-based HTE, there was a high probability that dopamine resulted fewer DAFICU28 in the highest quartile of predicted mortality risk. The effect-based HTE assessment model did not recommended dopamine over norepinephrine for any combination of possible modifiers including age, type of shock, presence of cardiomyopathy, and SOFA score. Receiving dopamine when the effect-based model recommended norepinephrine was associated with an absolute increase in composite endpoint of 6%. Conclusion The harm associated with the use of dopamine for the management of shock appears to be present in both septic and cardiogenic shock patients. There was no suggestion of any subgroup in which dopamine was found to be favourable over norepinephrine.

The prevalence of infection is high among patients admitted to the ICU and one of the main causes of mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the burden of infectious diseases in patients admitted to ICUs in Nordic countries and the Netherlands in comparison with Mediterranean countries.

ECLT measurement at admission could be a marker of organ dysfunction and a prognostic indicator in critically ill patients.

In the context of efforts to limit healthcare-associated opioid exposure, our findings highlight the considerable opioid exposure that accompanies mechanical ventilation and suggest potential under and over-treatment with analgesia. Our results facilitate benchmarking of hospitals' analgesia practices against risk-adjusted averages and can be used to inform usual care control arms of analgesia and sedation clinical trials.