504 publications from this institution
We investigate the relationship between the K-edge fine structure of isolated single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and the Van Hove singularities (VHSs) in the conduction band density of states. To this end, we model X-ray absorption spectra of SWCNTs using the final-state approximation and the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) method. Both methods can reproduce the experimental fine structure, where the BSE results improve on peak positions and amplitude rations compared to the final-state approximation. When the fine structure in the modeled spectra is related to the VHSs significant differences are found. We suggest that these differences arise due to modifications of the core exciton wavefunctions induced by the confinement along the circumference. Additionally, we analyze the character of core excitons in SWCNTs and find that the first bright excitons are Frenkel excitons while higher-lying excitons are charge resonance states. Finally, we suggest that the qualitative picture based on VHSs in the density of states holds when there is a large energy gap between successive VHSs.
The random phase approximation (RPA) systematically overestimates the magnitude of the correlation energy and generally underestimates cohesive energies. This originates in part from the complete lack of exchange terms that would otherwise cancel Pauli exclusion principle violating (EPV) contributions. The uncanceled EPV contributions also manifest themselves in form of an unphysical negative pair density of spin-parallel electrons close to electron–electron coalescence. We follow considerations of many-body perturbation theory to propose an exchange correction that corrects the largest set of EPV contributions, while having the lowest possible computational complexity. The proposed method exchanges adjacent particle/hole pairs in the RPA diagrams, considerably improving the pair density of spin-parallel electrons close to coalescence in the uniform electron gas (UEG). The accuracy of the correlation energy is comparable to other variants of second-order screened exchange (SOSEX) corrections although it is slightly more accurate for the spin-polarized UEG. Its computational complexity scales as O(N5) or O(N4) in orbital space or real space, respectively. Its memory requirement scales as O(N2).