This chapter explores the synopsis of the Industry 5.0 paradigm, focusing on Human-robot collaboration, encompassing critical elements from following the progression of evolution from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 to the implementation of cutting-edge technologies and human-centric approaches within this framework. Industry 5.0 paradigm shift builds upon the foundation laid by Industry 4.0, with a renewed focus on integrating human intelligence and creativity with the capabilities of robots. The Operator of Industry 5.0 embodies the idea of skilled human operators working alongside automated systems to optimize performance and efficiency. Industry 5.0 technologies encompass collaborative robots (cobots) and advancements in robot learning, enabling safe and efficient collaboration between humans and machines and facilitating dynamic partnerships in shared workspaces. Human-centric approaches within Industry 5.0 technologies ensure that technological advancements align with human needs and preferences, fostering a work environment where humans and robots collaborate harmoniously. The concept of the Human Digital Twin offers a compelling instrument for identifying and optimizing human behavior within the context of Industry 5.0, enabling organizations to tailor processes and workflows to individual capabilities and preferences.
Compression toughness tests were carried out on concrete cylinders reinforced with three different aspect ratios of hooked-end steel fibers 60, 75, and 83 and six different percentages of steel fibers 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0% by volume of concrete. The w/c ratio used for the normal strength steel fiber reinforced concrete mixes (NSSFRC) was 0.55, and the water-cementitious ratio (w/c+s) for the high strength fiber reinforced concrete mixes (HSSFRC) was 0.31. For each mix, three test cylinders were tested for compression specific toughness. The effect of fiber reinforcement index: volume of fibers × length/diameter ratio on compression specific toughness and also on the relationship between these two properties is presented in this paper. As a result, (a) equations are proposed to quantify the effect of fibers on compression toughness ratio of concrete in terms of FRI, (b) equations obtained in terms of FRI and compression specific toughness of plain concrete to estimate both compression specific toughness of NSSFRC and HSSFRC (N.m), (c) equations obtained which represent the relationship between compression toughness index and FRI for NSSFRC and HSSFRC, respectively, and (d) equations obtained to quantify the relationship between compression specific toughness index and fiber reinforcement index for NSSFRC and HSSFRC, respectively. The proposed equations give good correlation with the experimental values.
Changes at different phases of a construction project are inevitable due to a multitude of reasons such as design changes, design errors, additions to scope, or unknown conditions that may arise due to resource limitations and the uniqueness of the project. For each change, contractors are entitled to an equitable adjustment to the base contract price and schedule. It is commonly accepted that change orders can have adverse effects on project performance, but these effects are difficult to quantify and manage, and they frequently lead to disputes. Most work in change order management focuses on labor productivity and does not pay as much attention to the quantification and management of the impact of change orders in regard to overall project performance in terms of time and cost. This paper describes a prototype expert system named QUICOPP that implements these ideas. The knowledge used in the system was acquired through a questionnaire survey administered to the contractors in North Cyprus construction industry. A list of factors that describe the adverse effects of change orders on project performance have been identified based on the survey, and this list of factors was used to develop a quantitative model of how different change orders affect the time and cost of a project. Our system provides a cost-effective means for handling change orders through all phases of a project such that construction operations can continue with the least amount of interruption that usually results from of disputes between different parties involved in a project.
This study takes a unique approach by investigating the integration of Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) within residential architecture. It explores their combined potential to foster neuro-responsive, sustainable environments within the framework of Construction 5.0. The methodological approach involves real-time BCI data and subjective evaluations of occupants’ experiences to elucidate cognitive and emotional states. These data inform BIM-driven alterations that facilitate adaptable, customized, and sustainability-oriented architectural solutions. The results highlight the ability of BCI–BIM integration to create dynamic, occupant-responsive environments that enhance well-being, promote energy efficiency, and minimize environmental impact. The primary contribution of this work is the demonstration of the viability of neuro-responsive architecture, wherein cognitive input from Brain–Computer Interfaces enables real-time modifications to architectural designs. This technique enhances built environments’ flexibility and user-centered quality by integrating occupant preferences and mental states into the design process. Furthermore, integrating BCI and BIM technologies has significant implications for advancing sustainability and facilitating the design of energy-efficient and ecologically responsible residential areas. The study offers practical insights for architects, engineers, and construction professionals, providing a method for implementing BCI–BIM systems to enhance user experience and promote sustainable design practices. The research examines ethical issues concerning privacy, data security, and informed permission, ensuring these technologies adhere to moral and legal requirements. The study underscores the transformational potential of BCI–BIM integration while acknowledging challenges related to data interoperability, integrity, and scalability. As a result, ongoing innovation and rigorous ethical supervision are crucial for effectively implementing these technologies. The findings provide practical insights for architects, engineers, and industry professionals, offering a roadmap for developing intelligent and ethically sound design practices.