This chapter discusses effects of airway neuropeptides that are relevant to the pathophysiology of asthma and whether this might lead to new therapeutic approaches in the future. It considers neuropeptide separately, but it is important to recognize that neuropeptides act as cotransmitters of classical autonomic nerves and that each peptide may have interactions with other nerves, resulting in complex effects on a tissue. Vasoactive intestinal peptide is a potent relaxant of human airways in vitro but is ineffective by inhalation, presumably because of metabolism by airway enzymes. Neuropeptides are cotransmitters in classic autonomic nerves and may be regarded as modulators of autonomic effects, perhaps acting to "fine-tune" airway functions and to modulate the release of other neurotransmitters. Although there has been optimism that inhibitors or mimics of neuropeptides might have therapeutic application in asthma, it is unlikely that such drugs would have a major advantage over existing agents.
A 64-year-old woman with stable angina pectoris underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of the left anterior descending coronary artery whereby a 3.0/12 mm bioresorbable everolimus-eluting stent (BVS, Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was deployed over the ostium of a diagonal branch. After stent post-dilatation, angiography showed no residual stenosis and TIMI III antegrade side branch flow ( Panel …
Conference Abstract| February 01 1984 New Device for Airflow Measurement: Comparison with Pneumotachograph and Differentiated Respitrace Volume S. E. Mannix; S. E. Mannix 1Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 OHS Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar P. Chowienczyk; P. Chowienczyk 1Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 OHS Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar P. J. Barnes; P. J. Barnes 1Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 OHS Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar N. B. Pride N. B. Pride 1Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 OHS Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Clin Sci (Lond) (1984) 66 (2): 58P. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs066058Pa_pt2 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation S. E. Mannix, P. Chowienczyk, P. J. Barnes, N. B. Pride; New Device for Airflow Measurement: Comparison with Pneumotachograph and Differentiated Respitrace Volume. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 February 1984; 66 (2): 58P. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs066058Pa_pt2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll JournalsClinical Science Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 1984 The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society1984 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Abstract Three types of geometric imperfection need to be considered in the design of structural systems: global frame out‐of‐plumbness, also referred to as sway imperfections, member out‐of‐straightness, also known as bow imperfections, and local cross‐section imperfections. For modelling convenience, equivalent geometric imperfections are often employed to account for the combined influence of initial geometric imperfections and residual stresses. For design by geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with imperfections (GMNIA), amplitudes for equivalent bow imperfections for members are provided in prEN 1993‐1‐14; however, no provisions exist for global sway imperfections. Therefore, equivalent sway imperfections suitable for use in the design of steel structures by GMNIA, expressed by the out‐of‐plumbness Φ 0,GMNIA are established herein. Two proposals for calculating Φ 0,GMNIA are presented: (1) Φ 0,GMNIA = Φ 0,geom + α/100 with Φ 0,geom representing the amplitude of the pure geometric sway imperfection, and (2) Φ 0,GMNIA = α /50. In both proposals, the varying influence of residual stresses from different cross‐section geometries and axes of bending is captured by the imperfection factor α , as defined by the buckling curves in EN 1993‐1‐1 for carbon steel and EN 1993‐1‐4 for stainless steel, respectively.