6,963 publications from this institution
Polymer-controlled paclitaxel-eluting stents have shown a pronounced reduction in neointimal hyperplasia compared with bare metal stents (BMS). The aim of this substudy was to evaluate local arterial responses through the use of serial quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses in the TAXUS II trial.TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This IVUS substudy included patients treated with one study stent who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up (BMS, 152 patients; SR, 81; MR, 81). The analyzed stented segment (15 mm) was divided into 5 subsegments in which mean vessel area (VA), stent area (SA), lumen area (LA), intrastent neointimal hyperplasia area (NIHA), and peristent area (VA-SA) were measured. NIHA was significantly reduced in SR (0.7+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001) and MR (0.6+/-0.8 mm2, P<0.001) compared with BMS (1.9+/-1.5 mm2), with no differences between the two paclitaxel-eluting release formulations. Longitudinal distribution of neointimal hyperplasia throughout the paclitaxel-eluting stent was uniform. Neointimal growth was independent of peristent area at postprocedure examination in all groups. There were progressive increases in peristent area from BMS to SR to MR (0.5+/-1.7, 1.0+/-1.8, and 1.4+/-2.0 mm2, respectively; P<0.001). The increase in peristent area was directly correlated with increases in VA.Both SR and MR paclitaxel-eluting stents prevent neointimal formation to the same degree compared with BMS. However, the difference in peristent remodeling suggests a release-dependent effect between SR and MR.
Many factors may influence the release of neurotransmitters from airway nerves [1]. This is likely to be important in physiological control of airway functions and may be particularly relevant in airway diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Neural elements in airways interact in a complex manner and the activation of certain neural pathways may profoundly influence the release of transmitters from other neural pathways. Similarly inflamma- tory mediators released from inflammatory cells in the airways may also modulate neurotransmitter release. There are marked differences be- tween species in airway innervation and in neuromodulatory effects and, wherever possible, studies in human airways have been emphasised, although information on neuromodulation in human airways is some- what limited at present.
BACKGROUND: Leukotriene (LT) B4 is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant and also stimulates eosinophils in vitro, but its role in asthmatic inflammation is unknown. METHODS: The effect of the novel LTB4 receptor antagonist, LY293111, was examined using allergen challenge as a model for asthmatic inflammation in 12 atopic asthmatic subjects in a double blind placebo controlled crossover trial. Subjects with an established early (EAR) and late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen at screening received oral LY293111 in a dose of 112 mg three times daily for seven days or placebo before further allergen challenge. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of 28 days. Individuals underwent histamine challenge one hour before and three hours after allergen challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was obtained at bronchoscopy 24 hours after allergen challenge. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline lung function, EAR, LAR, or in airway responsiveness to histamine before and after allergen between placebo and LY293111. By contrast, treatment with LY293111 significantly reduced the number of neutrophils in BAL fluid expressed as both absolute cell numbers and percentage cell differential counts: absolute cell counts, median (range) 0.04 (0.02-0.15) x 10(6) after LY293111, 0.09 (0.02-0.43) x 10(6) after placebo; percentage differential cell counts 0.35 (0.1-2.0) after LY293111, 0.80 (0.1-3.6) after placebo (p < 0.05). Eosinophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes in BAL fluid did not differ between treatments. There was a significant reduction in the concentration of myeloperoxidase (MPO) with both placebo (16 (6.6) ng/ml) and LY293111 (3.5 (1.8) ng/ml) and of LTB4 (placebo 4.6 (1.2) pg/ml, LY293111 2.2 (0.2) pg/ml). Concentrations of LTC4 and interleukin 8 were reduced, although not significantly, whereas concentrations of interleukin 6, GM-CSF, and TNF-alpha were unchanged by LY293111. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate an influence of LTB4 on neutrophil influx and activation in the airway following allergen challenge. Despite this anti-inflammatory effect, there was no measured physiological benefit and this questions the functional role of the neutrophil in the pathophysiology of allergen induced asthma.