No abstract is provided for this article.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100015658 Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration affects various soil processes especially related to carbon (C) and nutrient turnover. The methods to study the effects of elevated CO2 (eCO2) were shortly presented. All effects of eCO2 on soil are indirect: by plants through increased net primary production and belowground C inputs due to higher photosynthesis under eCO2. We summarized the impacts of eCO2 on (1) cycling of C and nitrogen (N), (2) microbial growth and enzyme activities, (3) turnover of soil organic matter and induced priming effects including N mobilization/immobilization processes, and (4) associated nutrient mobilization from organic sources. Higher C input from plants under eCO2 leads to faster C turnover due to high microbial activities including respiration, enzymatic activities, and priming effect of soil organic matter. Comparing the effects of eCO2 on changes in pools with that in fluxes we conclude that eCO2 in the atmosphere will have small (or no) effects on the C pools but will strongly increase the fluxes. The stable pools but intensified fluxes will accelerate biogeochemical cycles under elevated CO2.
Increasing natural and anthropogenic deposition of nitrate (NO3 −) and sulfate (SO4 2−) to peatlands may modify CH4 oxidation, CO2 and N2O production, thereby affecting the balance of greenhouse gases (GHG) globally. Among environmental factors controlling these biogeochemical processes, effects of peatland microrelief are poorly understood. Fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O were measured before and after incubation with NO3 − and SO4 2− for peat samples collected from various microrelief positions of a boreal oligotrophic mire in Eastern Finland. Soil was spiked with 13CH4 to understand the processes of CH4 oxidation, its microbial utilization and incorporation into soil organic matter (SOM). We hypothesized that the addition of NO3 − and SO4 2− would 1) stimulate CO2 and N2O production (nutritional effect), but 2) decrease CH4 oxidation due to acceleration of other more energetically favorable processes (e.g. denitrification), and 3) these patterns should follow the naturally established aerobic zone of a microform type and decrease with depth. Microbial biomass (MB) at 50 cm below all microforms was 9–15 folds higher than in the topsoil. MB controlled the GHG dynamics and was related to specific depth-dependent environmental conditions, rather than oxygen availability. Indeed, production of CO2 and N2O, and oxidation potentials of CH4 revealed no clear linkage with the naturally established aeration zone of the peatland’s microforms. Following NO3 − and SO4 2 − addition, production of CO2 decreased by 20–65% compared to the control, with the greatest reduction in CO2 emission occurring in the topsoil of hollows. In turn, CH4 oxidation was suppressed by 20–94% with NO3 − addition at 50 cm in lawns and with both NO3 − and SO4 2− at 50 cm in hollows. The N2O production was increased up to 180–240 times under NO3 − treatment at 50 cm in hollows and lawns. In conclusion, human-induced deposition of NO3 − and SO4 2− may suppress CO2 emissions from and CH4 oxidation by boreal oligotrophic mires especially under the conditions of deposition increase. Finally, the deposition of inorganic compounds is strongly important to be considered in the estimation of ecosystem C and N balances.