ISHS Ecological aspects of Vegetable Fertigation in Integrated crop Production in the Field MODELLING ON THE GROWTH AND N UPTAKE OF LEEK AND BROCCOLI
The fate of incorporated slurry‐C was examined in a laboratory experiment using two UK grassland soils, i.e. a Pelostagnogley (5.1 %C) and a Brown Earth (2.3 %C). C 3 and C 4 slurries were incorporated into these two wet‐sieved (C 3 ) soils (from 4–10 cm depth). Gas samples were collected 0.2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 20, 30 and 40 days after slurry application and analyzed for CO 2 concentration and δ 13 C content. Slurry incorporation into the soil strongly increased soil CO 2 respiration compared with the unamended soil. Total (40 day) cumulative CO 2 flux was higher for the Pelostagnogley than the Brown Earth. The 13 C natural abundance tracer technique enabled quantification of the sources of respired CO 2 and priming effects (days 0–9). Proportionally more slurry‐derived C was respired from the Pelostagnogley (46%) than the Brown Earth (36%). The incorporated slurry‐C was lost twice as fast as the native soil C in both soils. Slurry incorporation induced a priming effect, i.e. additional release of soil‐derived C, most pronounced in the Pelostagnogley (highest C content). The majority of respired soil‐derived C (>70%) was primed C. The study indicated that potential reductions in ammonia volatilisation following slurry injection to grasslands might be negated by enhanced loss of primed soil C (i.e. pollution swapping). Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Two approaches to quantitatively estimating root-derived carbon in soil CO2 efflux and in microbial biomass were compared under controlled conditions. In the 14C labelling approach, maize (Zea mays) was pulse labelled and the tracer was chased in plant and soil compartments. Root-derived carbon in CO2 efflux and in microbial biomass was estimated based on a linear relationship between the plant shoots and the below-ground compartment. Since the maize plants were grown on C3 soil, in a second approach the differences in 13C natural abundance between C3 and C4 plants were used to calculate root-derived carbon in the CO2 efflux and in the microbial biomass. The root-derived carbon in the total CO2 efflux was between 69% and 94% using the 14C labelling approach and between 86% and 94% in the natural 13C labelling approach. At a 13C fractionation measured to be 5.2‰ between soil organic matter (SOM) and CO2, the root-derived contribution to CO2 ranged from 70% to 88% and was much closer to the results of the 14C labelling approach. Root-derived contributions to the microbial biomass carbon ranged from 2% to 9% using 14C labelling and from 16% to 36% using natural 13C labelling. At a 3.2‰ 13C fractionation between SOM and microbial biomass, both labelling approaches yielded an equal contribution of root-derived C in the microbial biomass. Both approaches may therefore be used to partition CO2 efflux and to quantify the C sources of microbial biomass. However, the assumed 13C fractionation strongly affects the contributions of individual C sources.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Soil Health is defined as the capacity of a soil to function within ecosystem and land-use boundaries to sustain biological productivity, maintain environmental quality, and promote plant and animal health (FAO, 2015). This soil functionality is mainly defined by processes and fluxes – the dynamic parameters, and not on their total amounts. Most studies, however, use pools of nutrients or static properties, which are hardly to connect with functions.The main aims of this presentation is to raise the difference between commonly used pools (not reflecting the soil health) and fluxes – defining the soil health, but measured very seldom. Further, the question of the scale size by evaluation of soil health will be discussed.Numerous soil quality indices (SQI) have been suggested to evaluate specific groups of soil functions, but the comparison of such SQI is impossible because they are based on a combination of properties specific for each soil. To avoid this problem, we suggest an SQI-area approach based on comparison of the areas on a radar diagram of a combination of chemical, biological and physical properties. The new approach is independent of the SQI principle and allows simple comparison of parameter groups and soils of various degradation or recovery stages.Another approach analyzing the resistance and sensitivity of properties to degradation is suggested to evaluate soil health. The resistance and sensitivity of soil properties are determined through comparison with the decrease of soil organic carbon (SOC) as a universal parameter responsible for many functions. The SQI-area and resistance/sensitivity approaches were tested based on the degradation of Alisols and on recovery of Phaeozems and Chernozems chronosequences after the abandonment of cropland soils. Both the SQI-area and the resistance/sensitivity approaches provide very good visualistion of the results, are useful for basic and applied research, and help decisionmakers to evaluate land-use practices and measure the degree of soil degradation.ReferencesGuillaume T, Maranguit D, Murtilaksono K, Kuzyakov Y. 2016. Sensitivity and resistance of soil fertility indicators to land-use changes: New concept and examples from conversion of Indonesian rainforest to plantations. Ecological Indicators 67, 49-57.Kuzyakov Y, Gunina A, Zamanian K, Tian J, Luo Y, Xu X, Yudina A, Aponte H, Alharbi H, Ovsepyan L, Kurganova L, Ge T, Guillaume T. 2020. New approaches for evaluation of soil health, sensitivity and resistance to degradation. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering 7 (3), 282-288.