This study analyzed the frequency control challenges within the West Africa Power Pool Interconnected Transmission System (WAPPITS) as it plans to incorporate variable renewable energy (VRE) resources, such as wind and solar energy. Concerns center on the ability of WAPPITS primary frequency control reserves to adapt to high VRE penetration given the synchronization and frequency control problems experienced by the three separate synchronous blocks of WAPPITS. Optimizing solutions requires a better understanding of WAPPITS’ current frequency control approach. This study used questionnaires to understand operators’ practical experience with frequency control and compared these observations to field tests at power plants and frequency response metrics during system events. Eight (8) of ten (10) Transmission System Operators (TSOs) indicated that primary frequency control service was implemented in the TSO, but nine (9) of ten TSOs indicated that the reserves provided were inadequate to meet system needs. Five (5) of ten (10) respondents answered “yes” to the provision of secondary frequency control service, while only one (1) indicated that secondary reserves were adequate. Three (3) TSOs indicated they have AGC (Automatic Generation Control) installed in the control room, but none have implemented it for secondary frequency control. The results indicate a significant deficiency in primary control reserves, resulting in a reliance on under-frequency load shedding for primary frequency control. Additionally, the absence of an AGC system for secondary frequency regulation required manual intervention to restore frequency after events. To ensure the effectiveness of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) and the reliable operation of the WAPPITS with a higher penetration of inverter-based VRE, this paper recommends (a) implementing and enforcing basic primary frequency control structures through regional regulation and (b) establishing an ancillary services market to mobilize secondary frequency control resources.
Advanced meters now account for almost half of the electric meters in the United States. In addition to reducing the costs of meter reading, these meters provide a vast increase in the amount of consumption data available to the utility. Many organizations, however, lack the expertise to analyze this data, so it languishes unused. This paper describes steps taken to make AMI data usable for day-to-day planning tasks at a medium-sized distribution utility. The proposed approach can be implemented on commodity hardware, providing a cost effective and secure platform for advanced analysis tasks.
Global efforts to track methane emissions from oil and natural gas operations have recently converged around measures of methane emissions intensity, including emergent requirements for reporting as part of import standards. However, multiple definitions of methane intensity have led to conflicting approaches that hinder clear comparisons among regions and obstruct the development of effective policy. This study analyzes six of the predominant methane intensity metrics and shows how half, by attributing methane exclusively to gas production while overlooking coproduced oil and liquids, can bias comparisons among jurisdictions and have limited practical utility. These simple loss rates are strongly dependent on gas-oil ratios and tend toward meaningless infinite methane intensities in oil-dominant operations. The three remaining metrics overcome this limitation and are recommended as unbiased and directly intercomparable measures of methane performance. We further show how these latter metrics, which effectively benchmark methane emissions against total energy production, are computationally and functionally equivalent when emissions are allocated to oil and gas operations using energy production. Finally, we address the challenge of propagating emissions through the supply chain and demonstrate how, for the recommended intensity metrics, embodied intensities of any facility's outputs can be easily calculated from feeder-facility intensities and energy production.
Using results from a nationally representative measurement campaign at 180 gathering compressor stations conducted with nine industry partners, this study estimated emissions for the U.S. gathering sector, where sector-specific emission factors have not been previously available. The study drew from a partner station population of 1705 stations-a significantly larger pool than was available for prior studies. Data indicated that whole gas emission rates from components on gathering stations were comparable to or higher than emission factors utilized by the EPA's greenhouse gas reporting program (GHGRP) but less than emission factors used for similar components on transmission compressor stations. Field data also indicated that the national population of stations likely has a higher fraction of smaller stations, operating at lower throughput per station, than the data used to develop the per-station emission factor used in EPA's greenhouse gas inventory (GHGI). This was the first national study to incorporate extensive activity data reported to the GHGRP, including 319 basin-level reports, covering 15,895 reported compressors. Combining study emission data with 2017 GHGRP activity data, the study indicated statistically lower national emissions of 1290 [1246-1342] Gg methane per year or 66% [64-69%] of current GHGI estimates, despite estimating 17% [12-22%] more stations than the 2017 GHGI (95% confidence interval). Finally, we propose a replicable method that uses GHGRP activity data to annually update GHGI gathering and boost sector emissions.
Across the globe nearly 1.6 billion people lack access to electricity, of which many live in rural or remote areas of the developing countries. The extension of central grid for rural electrification is not economically viable due to the geographical placement and low initial power demand. However, for rural villages, systems that are less reliable than grid standards may be acceptable, and allow for smaller systems implemented at lower cost. This study considers the optimal sizing of PV generation and energy storage for a rural off-grid PV-battery system in Rwanda.
This study presents the results of a campaign that estimated methane emissions at 268 gas production facilities in the Fayetteville shale gas play using onsite measurements (261 facilities) and two downwind methods – the dual tracer flux ratio method (Tracer Facility Estimate – TFE, 17 facilities) and the EPA Other Test Method 33a (OTM33A Facility Estimate – OFE, 50 facilities). A study onsite estimate (SOE) for each facility was developed by combining direct measurements and simulation of unmeasured emission sources, using operator activity data and emission data from literature. The SOE spans 0–403 kg/h and simulated methane emissions from liquid unloadings account for 88% of total emissions estimated by the SOE, with 76% (95% CI [51%–92%]) contributed by liquid unloading at two facilities. TFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 15 of 16 (94%) facilities where the measurements were paired, while OFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 28 of 43 (65%) facilities. However, variance-weighted least-squares (VWLS) regressions performed on sets of paired estimates indicate statistically significant differences between methods. The SOE represents a lower bound of emissions at facilities where onsite direct measurements of continuously emitting sources are the primary contributor to the SOE, a sub-selection of facilities which minimizes expected inter-method differences for intermittent pneumatic controllers and the impact of episodically-emitting unloadings. At 9 such facilities, VWLS indicates that TFE estimates systematically higher emissions than SOE (TFE-to-SOE ratio = 1.6, 95% CI [1.2 to 2.1]). At 20 such facilities, VWLS indicates that OFE estimates systematically lower emissions than SOE (OFE-to-SOE ratio of 0.41 [0.26 to 0.90]). Given that SOE at these facilities is a lower limit on emissions, these results indicate that OFE is likely a less accurate method than SOE or TFE for this type of facility.