This analysis proposes a modified A* routing algorithm for the routing of networked rural electrification systems in areas with substantial topological variation. Due to geographical complexity, using standard A* algorithm for optimal routing is very inefficient. This new algorithm utilizes a modified heuristic to reduce computational time while achieving near-optimal routing results. The modified algorithm is also more suitable for use in routing studies where inputs are uncertain, requiring Monte Carlo simulations to assess the robustness of proposed routes.
Meter-level data, such as those available through advance metering infrastructures (AMI), have enabled extensive monitoring and control of the electric distribution system. In this work, we develop and apply a physics-based model to simulate the heat transfer dynamics for distribution transformers in underground enclosed vaults with no ventilation. The resulting model compares well with predictions from an established semi-empirical model and in field measurements. The model suggests that the transformer aging may be significantly under-estimated, by as much as a factor of ~4, by well-established semi-empirical models for these enclosed submersible transformer applications. Results also show that system-wide application of the model provides transformer-specific insights which should help guide planning and maintenance.
Wide-area aerial methods provide comprehensive screening of methane emissions from oil and gas (O&G) facilities in production basins. Emissions detections (`plumes') from these studies are also frequently scaled to basin level. However, little information exists to determine if plumes detected fugitive emissions or known, reported, maintenance activities. This study analyzed an aircraft field study in the Denver-Julesberg basin to quantify how often plumes identified maintenance events, using a geospatial inventory of 12,629 O&G facilities with facility outlines. Study partners (7 midstream and production operators) provided timing and location of 5910 maintenance events that occurred in a 6-week period. Results indicated three substantial uncertainties with potential bias unaddressed by current prior studies. First, plumes often detect maintenance events, which short-duration, large, and poorly estimated by aircraft methods: 9.2% to 48% [35% to 62%] of plumes on production were likely due to known maintenance events. Second, data indicated that plumes on midstream facilities were both infrequent and unpredictable, calling into question whether these estimates were representative of midstream emissions. Finally, 4 plumes attributed to O&G, representing 19% of all emissions, were not aligned with any location that would logically create emissions. While it is unclear how frequently this occurs, in this study it had material impact on emissions estimates and was detectable only with complete geospatial information. While aircraft emissions detection remains a powerful tool for identifying methane emissions on oil and gas facilities, this study indicates that additional data inputs, such as detailed GIS data, a more nuanced analysis of emission persistence and frequency, and improved sampling strategies are required to accurately scale plume estimates to basin emissions.
Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facility that closely resembles upstream natural gas field operations. Professional surveyors from 16 oil and gas companies and 8 regulatory agencies participated, completing 488 tests over a 10 month period. Detection rates were significantly lower than prior studies focused on camera performance. The leak size required to achieve a 90% probability-of-detection in this study is an order-of-magnitude larger than prior studies. Study results indicate that OGI survey experience significantly impacts leak detection rate: Surveyors from operators/contractors who had surveyed more than 551 sites prior to testing detected 1.7 (1.5–1.8) times more leaks than surveyors who had completed fewer surveys. Highly experienced surveyors adjust their survey speed, examine components from multiple viewpoints, and make other adjustments that improve their leak detection rate, indicating that modifications of survey protocols and targeted training could improve leak detection rates overall.