838 publications from this institution
Purpose : Children who are allowed greater independent mobility (IM) are more physically active. This study investigated associations between parents’ current travel mode to work, their own IM and school travel mode as a child, and their child’s IM. Methods : Children in grades 4 to 6 (n = 1699) were recruited from urban, suburban, and rural schools in Vancouver, Ottawa, and Trois-Rivières. Parents reported their current travel mode to work, IM, and school travel mode as a child. Children self-reported their IM using Hillman’s 6 mobility licenses. Multiple imputation was performed to replace missing data. Gender-stratified generalized linear mixed models were adjusted for child age, parent gender, urbanization, and socioeconomic status. Results : The older a parent was allowed to travel alone as a child, the less IM their child had (boys: β = −0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.13 to −0.04; girls: β = −0.09, 95% CI, −0.13 to −0.06). Girls whose parents biked to work ( β = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.06–0.83) or lived in Trois-Rivières versus other sites ( β = 0.82, 95% CI, −0.43 to 1.21) had higher IM. IM increased with each year of age (boys: β = 0.46, CI, 0.34–0.58; girls: β = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.28–0.48). Conclusion: Parents who experienced IM later may be more restrictive of their child’s IM. This may help explain the intergenerational decline in children’s IM.
In their editorial, Armstrong and Welsman1 suggest that the 20 m shuttle run test (20mSRT) (mis)represents and (mis)interprets youth cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and potentially (mis)informs health promotion and clinical practice. Their main arguments are: (a) the 20mSRT only provides an estimate of CRF (ie, peak ![Formula][1]</img> O2) and (b) estimates are ratio-scaled (ie, expressed relative to body mass). In this response we provide several reasons, rooted in evidence, which refute their interpretation of our work. CRF measures the body's capacity to deliver and utilise oxygen for energy transfer to support muscle activity during physical activity.2 The 20mSRT provides a simple, single measure that assesses the integrated responses of the physiological systems' ability to perform progressive aerobic exercise. Unfortunately, it does not provide specific information on the function or contribution of specific systems that can be obtained from a gas analysed peak ![Formula][2]</img> O2 test. The 20mSRT is a good measure of functional exercise capacity that authentically imitates youth physical activities (eg, running, agility) in a natural setting. At the individual level, the 20mSRT is a true indicator of peak ![Formula][3]</img> O2 (absolute or … [1]: /embed/mml-math-1.gif [2]: /embed/mml-math-2.gif [3]: /embed/mml-math-3.gif