Linear feedback shift register (LFSR) reseeding forms the basis for many test-compression solutions. A seed can be computed for each test cube by solving a system of linear equations based on the feedback polynomial of the LFSR. Despite the availability of numerous LFSR-reseeding-based compression methods in the literature, relatively little is known about the effectiveness of these seeds for unmodeled defects, particularly since there are often several candidate seeds for a test cube. We use the recently proposed output deviation measure of the resulting patterns as a metric to select appropriate LFSR seeds. Experimental results are reported using test patterns for stuck-at and transition faults derived from selected seeds for the ISCAS-89 and the IWLS-05 benchmark circuits. These patterns achieve higher coverage for transition and stuck-open faults than patterns obtained using other seed-generation methods for LFSR reseeding. Given a pattern pair ( <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> , <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ) for transition faults, we also examine the transition-fault coverage for launch on capture by using <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> and <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> to separately compute output deviations. Results show that <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> tends to be better when there is a high proportion of do-not-care bits in the test cubes, while <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> is a more appropriate choice when the transition-fault coverage is high.
The role of the electrostatic environment in chemical reactions has long been an important research field, but most studies have focused on the influence of external electric fields on chemical processes, while the effect from the intrinsic electrostatic charges on the solution itself has been ignored. How an electrostatic field generated by contact electrification affects the solvent environment in a chemical reaction and then the chemical reactivity is still ambiguous. Here, based on the inspiration of the droplet triboelectric nanogenerator, electrostatic interactions between a statically charged luminol droplet and the surrounding directional electrostatic field were analyzed, and we demonstrate a relationship between the sign of the luminol sample (negatively or positively charged) and its effect on the reaction reactivity. Our results show that the increased reaction activity and the enhanced chemiluminescence (CL) only occurred when the luminol droplet yields positive charges, while a negatively charged luminol, on the contrary, tends to inhibit the CL, which brings direct evidence of the charge carriers of triboelectricity being electrons at the liquid–solid interface. This work provides a strategy for electrostatically regulating CL by simply statically charging a reaction solution with a dielectric solid and also carries a cautionary message on what to consider when preparing a sample for a chemical reaction.
We report a new structure, mesoporous structured polyhedral drum and spherical cages and shells formed by textured self-assembly of ZnO nanocrystals, which are made by a novel self-assembly process during epitaxial surface oxidation. The cages/shells exhibit unique geometrical shapes, and their walls are composed of mesoporous and textured ZnO nanocrystals. The structures of the cages and shells are studied, and a growth mechanism is proposed to be a process following solidification of the Zn liquid droplets, surface oxidation, and sublimation.