The SU.VI.MAX study is a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial testing, for 8 years, the effect of a combination of antioxidant vitamins and minerals, at doses considered to be nutritional (120 mg vitamin C, 30 mg vitamin E, 6mg beta-carotene, 100 lg selenium and 20 mg zinc) in reducing cancer and ischaemic vascular disease incidence in a general population (12,741 middleaged). After 7.5 years, low-dose antioxidant supplementation had no effect on vascular disease incidence. This dose lowered, however, total cancer incidence in men, but not in women. With regard to contradictory results of observational and interventional studies published for the last decades, we can consider that the effect of antioxidant on cancer may depend on the doses (nutritional versus pharmacological), baseline antioxidant status (different between gender and/or nutritional status) and health status of subjects (healthy versus cancer high-risk subjects). Antioxidant supplementation may have a beneficial effect on cancer incidence only in healthy subjects who are not exposed to cancer risk, and with a particularly low baseline status. Finally, antioxidants as well as free radicals appear to be ambiguous nutrients with a wide range of benefits and toxicity. High doses of antioxidant supplements may be deleterious in high-risk subjects without any clinical symptoms in whom the initial phase of cancer development has already started.
Although dairy products have been found to be associated with an elevated risk of prostate cancer, studies investigating the potential effect of Ca are limited, and findings are inconsistent. The objective of the present study was to test the relationship between the risk of prostate cancer and consumption of dairy products and Ca. The analysis included 2776 men from the French SU.VI.MAX (Supplementation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants) prospective study, among whom sixty-nine developed prostate cancer during the follow-up period (median: 7.7 years). Food consumption was assessed at inclusion from repeated 24 h records and nutrient intake was calculated using a food composition table. A higher risk of prostate cancer was observed among subjects with higher dairy product (relative risk (RR; 95 % CI), 4th quartile v. 1st: 1.35 (1.02, 1.78), P = 0.04) and Ca intake (RR (95 % CI), 4th quartile v. 1st: 2.43 (1.05, 5.62), P = 0.04). Nevertheless, we identified a harmful effect of yoghurt consumption upon the risk of prostate cancer (RR (95 % CI), increment 125 g/d: 1.61 (1.07, 2.43), P = 0.02) independently of the Ca content. Our data support the hypothesis that dairy products have a harmful effect with respect to the risk of prostate cancer, largely related to Ca content. The higher risk of prostate cancer with linear increasing yoghurt consumption seems to be independent of Ca and may be related to some other component.
Read moreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Read moreZureik, M.1; Galan, P.2; Bertrais, S.2; Mennen, L.2; Czernichow, S.2; Blacher, J.3; Ducimetiere, P.3; Hercberg, S.2 Author Information
Read moreOur website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Read moreSkin sensitivity is a common concern that declines with age and is relevant for men as well as for women.
Read moreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/published
Read moreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/published
Read moreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Read moreAntioxidant micronutrients have been reported to be associated with an improvement in the blood profile, but the results are not consistent. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of antioxidant supplementation on changes in the serum lipid profile of adult participants in the SU.VI.MAX study. French adults (n = 12,741: 7,713 females aged 35-60 yr, and 5,028 males aged 45-60 yr) received daily antioxidant supplementation (120 mg vitamin C, 30 mg vitamin E, 6 mg beta-carotene, 100 microg selenium, and 20 mg zinc) or a matching placebo. Median follow-up time was 7.5 yr. After 7.5 yr, no effect of supplementation on total cholesterol was observed in men or women after adjusting for baseline total cholesterol levels and lipid-lowering medications. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (> or =6.5 mmol/L) showed a trend toward being higher in women who received supplements compared with those who received the placebo (P= 0.06). In both sexes, the group receiving supplements exhibited higher mean serum TG concentrations than did the placebo group (P= 0.06 in men; P= 0.05 in women). The prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (> or =2.3 mmol/L) was also significantly higher in men who received supplements (P= 0.03), but not in women. Our results suggest than long-term daily supplementation with low doses of beta-carotene, vitamins C and E, selenium, and zinc does not result in an improved lipid profile and could even adversely affect some blood lipids, possibly with a higher risk of hyperlipidemia in women.
Read more
.webp){kind=small}