What determines who gets cardiac resynchronization therapy in europe?

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Supported by Swedish Heart and Lung foundation and Stockholm County Council. Background/Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a valuable treatment in selected patients with heart failure (HF) but is still underutilized. Aim We compared three informative data sources, which enrolled patients with HF at different organization setting and identified clinical, organizational, and level of care factors linked to CRT implantation in these cohorts. Methods Data from three large cohorts of patients with HF were compared. Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in an ESC HF-Long Term Registry (ESC-HF-LT, n=25,621), a National HF Registry - Swede HF (n=156,621) and in the ESC-CRT Survey II (n=11088, all receiving CRT across 42 ESC countries), contributed data to the analysis. The ESC Survey II recruited patients at implanting centers, ESC-HF-LT at HF centers, whereas SwedeHF enrolled HF patients at different levels of care. Firstly, we compared patient characteristics, socio-economic and organizational factors between cohorts as well as between overlapping countries participating both in CRT Survey II and ESC HF LT. Secondly, we identified independent predictors of CRT use in the two registries using multivariable logistic regressions. Results Of the 1031 patients in ESC-HF-LT and the 5008 patients in Swede-HF, CRT was not used in 53-75 % of guideline- indicated patients. Women constituted 22% and median age ranged between 68-72 years. Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT), atrial fibrillation, previous myocardial infarction (SwedeHF) and HF hospitalization (ESC-HF-LT) was associated with more CRT use as was enrollment at university hospital and follow-up at HF center/Hospital. In Swede-HF above median income and higher education level were also independently associated with use of CRT. In the ESC-CRT Survey II (n=11.088) all patients received CRT with differences in the clinical indications between countries. Conclusion(s) CRT is an important treatment option for eligible patients with HF, which is still largely underused. The findings reported demonstrate that awareness of CRT indications as well as demographics, organizational and economic factors play an important role in CRT utilization.