Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
We need more randomized trials in nutrition—preferably large, long-term, and with negative results — John P A Ioannidis (2016) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
We need more randomized trials in nutrition—preferably large, long-term, and with negative results
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
We need more randomized trials in nutrition—preferably large, long-term, and with negative results
Editorial Material
2016
en
Authors
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Editorial Material
2017
Do we need randomized clinical trials in extracorporeal respiratory support? We are not sure
Jean Louis Vincent
,
Laurent Brochard
Article
2020
Why We Need a Long-Term Sustainable Venus Program
J. Helbert
,
M. D. Dyar
,
N. R. Izenberg
,
Richard Ghail
,
James Jim Brian Garvin
,
P. K. Byrne
,
S. E. Smrekar
,
M. S. Gilmore
,
Thomas Widemann
,
P. Beauchamp
,
Nigar Shaji
,
Ludmilla Zasova
Editorial Material
2013
We've made progress in the treatment of sepsis, so do we still need sepsis trials?
Jean Louis Vincent
Article
2019
Lost Evidence From Registered Large Long-Unpublished Randomized Controlled Trials: A Survey
Athina Tatsioni
,
Fotini B. Karassa
,
Steven N. Goodman
,
Deborah A. Zarin
,
Daniele Fanelli
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2008
Nested Randomized Trials in Large Cohorts and Biobanks
John P A Ioannidis
,
Hans‐Olov Adami
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.