Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus novel agent-based therapy for multiple myeloma (MM): A randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM trial). — Michèle Cavo (2016) | RDL Network
Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus novel agent-based therapy for multiple myeloma (MM): A randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM trial).
Article 2016 en
Authors
MC
Michèle Cavo
AP
Antonio Palumbo
SZ
Sonja Zweegman
Abstract
2 min read
8000 Background: The role of upfront ASCT for newly diagnosed (ND) MM (NDMM) patients (pts) has been questioned in the novel agent era. Methods: A phase 3 study was designed to compare [random (R) 1] 4 cycles of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) vs high-dose melphalan (HDM) and single or double ASCT (this latter limited to centers applying a tandem ASCT policy) as intensification therapy following induction with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone and subsequent collection of peripheral blood stem cells. Consolidation therapy with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs no consolidation (R2) was planned after VMP and HDM, followed by lenalidomide maintenance until progression or toxicity in both treatment arms. Primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from R1. A first prespecified interim analysis was performed in January 2016 when at least 33% of the required events had been observed. Results are herein reported. Results: From February 2011 through April 2014, 1503 pts aged ≤65 years with symptomatic NDMM were registered. Of these, 1308 pts were eligible for R1 and 1266 who were randomized (1:1 ratio; stratification by ISS stage) to VMP (512 pts) or HDM (1±2 ASCT) (754 pts) were analyzed. Median follow up from R1 was 24 months. PFS was significantly prolonged in pts randomized to HDM (HR=0.76; 95% CI=0.61-0.94; P=0.010), a benefit retained across predefined pt subgroups, including those with revised ISS stage III (HR=0.52; CI=0.32-0.84; P=0.008) and high-risk cytogenetics [t(4;14) ± del(17p) ± del(1p) ± 1q gain] (HR=0.72; CI=0.54-0.97; P=0.028). Superior rate of ≥ very good partial response was observed with HDM (84%) vs VMP (74%) (odds ratio=1.90; CI=1.42-2.54; P<0.0001). In a Cox regression analysis, randomization to HDM (HR=0.61, CI=0.45-0.82; P=0.001) was confirmed to be an independent predictor of prolonged PFS. Overall survival was not yet mature and no difference between the treatment groups was evident. Conclusions: Upfront ASCT still remains the preferred treatment for younger NDMM pts. Further follow-up of the study is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT01208766.
Pieter Sonneveld, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Meral Beksaç, Bronno van der Holt, Francesca Gay, Heinz Ludwig, Sonja Zweegman, Vladimír Maisnar, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Paolo Corradini, Fabrizio Patriarca, Angelo Belotti, Micol Quaresima, Mariella Grasso, Massimo Offidani, Laura París, Anna Marina Liberati, Markus Hansson, Heleen Visser-Wisselaar, Giulia Fumero, Renato Zambello, Paula F. Ypma, Anna Pascarella, Niels Frost Andersen, Alexandra Croockewit, Mario Boccadoro, Michèle Cavo
Davine Hofste op Bruinink, Mark van Duin, Meral Beksaç, Christoph Driessen, Heinz Ludwig, Michael Vermeulen, Rowan Kuiper, Martin H. van Vliet, Bronno van der Holt, Roman Hájek, Hans Erik Johnsen, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Antonio Palumbo, Michèle Cavo, Pieter Sonneveld
Katja Weisel, Chantal Doyen, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Adrian Yee, Juan José Lahuerta, Amber Martin, Karin Travers, Eric Druyts, Kabirraaj Toor, Niels Abildgaard, Jin Lu, Jan Van Droogenbroeck, Catarina Geraldes, Mario Petrini, Laurent Voillat, Éric Voog, Thierry Façon
Meletios A Dimopoulos, Ivan Špıčka, Hang Quach, Albert Oriol, Roman Hájek, Mamta Garg, Meral Beksaç, Sara Bringhen, Eirini Katodritou, Wee Joo Chng, Xavier Leleu, Shinsuke Iida, María‐Victoria Mateos, Gareth J. Morgan, Alexander Vorog, Richard Labotka, Bingxia Wang, Antonio Palumbo, Sagar Lonial
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.