Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses

T. D. Stanley; John P A Ioannidis; Maximilian Maier; Hristos Doucouliagos; Willem M. Otte; František Bartoš

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.004

Back

Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses

Article 2023 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2023

Unrestricted Weighted Least Squares Represent Medical Research Better than Random Effects in 67,308 Cochrane Meta-Analyses

John P A Ioannidis, T. D. Stanley, Maximilian Maier, Hristos Doucouliagos, Willem M. Otte, František Bartoš

Article2019

Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

Patrick Liu, John P A Ioannidis, Joseph S. Ross, Sanket S. Dhruva, Anita T. Luxkaranayagam, Vasilis S. Vasiliou, Joshua D. Wallach

Article2016

Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses

Joshua D. Wallach, Patrick G. Sullivan, John F. Trepanowski, Ewout W. Steyerberg, John P A Ioannidis

Preprint2024

Evaluation of reported claims of sex-based differences in treatment effects across meta-analyses: A meta-research study

Lum Kastrati, Sara Farina, Angelica Valz Gris, Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi, Erand Llanaj, Hugo G. Quezada‐Pinedo, Lia Bally, Taulant Muka, John P A Ioannidis

Article2025

Evaluation of reported claims of sex-based differences in treatment effects across meta-analyses: a meta-research study

Lum Kastrati, Sara Farina, Angelica Valz Gris, Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi, Erand Llanaj, Hugo G. Quezada‐Pinedo, Lia Bally, Taulant Muka, John P A Ioannidis