Two‐year clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping absorb scaffolds: An analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND single‐arm study — J. Ribamar Costa (2017) | RDL Network
Two‐year clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping absorb scaffolds: An analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND single‐arm study
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 91(7): 1202-1209
Article 2017 English
Authors
JC
J. Ribamar Costa
AA
Alexandre Abizaid
AB
Antonio L. Bartorelli
Abstract
2 min read
Background Preclinical data showed that overlapping (OVP) scaffolds might result in delayed healing and strut coverage compared to nonOVP scaffold segments. Furthermore, OVP in patients could result in increased periprocedure myocardial infarction (MI) rate secondary to side branch occlusion; however, little is known whether this may have an impact on long‐term clinical outcomes. Methods ABSORB EXTEND is a prospective, single‐arm, open‐label clinical study in which 812 patients were enrolled at 56 sites. In this study, we compared the immediate and 2‐year clinical outcomes of patients with OVP scaffolds ( n = 115) to those of patients with nonOVP scaffolds ( n = 697). The primary objective was the comparison of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, MI and ischemic‐driven target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and scaffold thrombosis (ST) rates up to 2 years. Results Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between cohorts except for longer lesions in the OVP patients as expected (16.7 ± 7.3 vs. 11.6 ± 4.4 mm, P < 0.0001), higher lesion complexity (B2) and numerically smaller vessel size. In‐hospital, there was a marked increase in MACE in the OVP cohort (7.0 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.002), exclusively driven by a higher rate of periprocedure MI (7.0 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.002). Long‐term MACE did not significantly differ between groups (10.4% in the OVP cohort vs. 6.6% in the no‐OVP group, P = 0.1) with comparable rates of cardiac death (0.9 vs. 1.2%, P = 1.0) and ischemia‐driven TLR (1.7 vs. 2.5%, P = 1.0). Cumulative incidence of MI was higher in the OVP cohort (7.8 vs. 3.0%, P = 0.02). Of note, the rate of MI between hospital discharge and 2‐year follow‐up was lower in the OVP cohort (0.8 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.04). Cumulative incidence of definite/probable ST was relatively low and comparable between groups (1.8 vs. 1.5%, P = 0.7). Conclusions In this low‐to‐moderate complex population treated with the ABSORB scaffold the OVP group showed a higher incidence of periprocedure MI with no immediate or long‐term increase in cardiac death, TLR or ST.
Yuki Katagiri, Yoshinobu Onuma, Taku Asano, Ply Chichareon, Carlos Collet, Yosuke Miyazaki, Jan J. Piek, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Alexandre Abizaid, John A. Ormiston, Bernard Chevalier, Patrick W. Serruys
Yuki Ishibashi, Shimpei Nakatani, Yohei Sotomi, Pannipa Suwannasom, Maik J. Grundeken, Héctor M. García‐García, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Robert Whitbourn, Bernard Chevalier, Alexandre Abizaid, John A. Ormiston, Richard Rapoza, Susan Veldhof, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys
J. Ribamar Costa, Alexandre Abizaid, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Robert Whitbourn, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Bernard Chevalier, Marcos Perin, Ashok Seth, Roberto Botelho, Patrick W. Serruys
J. Ribamar Costa, Alexandre Abizaid, Robert Whitbourn, Patrick W. Serruys, Nigel Jepson, Clemens Steinwender, Marrianne Stuteville, Divine Ediebah, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Antonio L. Bartorelli
Matteo Ghione, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Stephan Windecker, Patrick W. Serruys, Paweł Buszman, Axel Linke, Hae Young Sohn, Roberto Corti, Diethmar Antoni, William Wijns, Rodrigo Estévez‐Loureiro, Marie‐Claude Morice, Gerrit‐Anne van Es, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Peter Jüni, Pedro Eerdmans, Ton de Vries, Stéphanie Konik, Carlo Di Mario
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.