Transcatheter aortic valve implantation underwent progressive improvements until it became the default therapy for inoperable patients, and a recommended therapy in high-risk operable patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. In the lower-risk patient strata, a currently costly therapy that still has important complications with questionable durability is competing with the established effective and still-improving surgical replacement. This report tries to weigh the clinical evidence, the recent technical improvements, the durability, and the cost-effectiveness claims supporting the adoption of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in intermediate-low risk patients. The importance of appropriate patients’ risk stratification and a more comprehensive approach to estimate that risk are also emphasized in the present report.
Lutz Buellesfeld, Ulrich Gerckens, Gerhard Schüler, Raoul Bonan, Jan Kovac, Patrick W. Serruys, Marino Labinaz, Peter den Heijer, Michael Mullen, Wayne Tymchak, Stephan Windecker, Ralf Mueller, Eberhard Grube
Apostolos Tzikas, Nicolò Piazza, Marcel L. Geleijnse, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Rutger‐Jan Nuis, Carl Schultz, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Tjebbe W. Galema, A. Pieter Kappetein, Patrick W. Serruys, Peter P. de Jaegere
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.