The effectiveness, feasibility, duration of effects, co-benefits, disbenefits, cost effectiveness and governability of four ocean-based negative emissions technologies (NETs) are assessed in comparison to eight other ocean-based measures. Their role in revising UNFCCC Parties' future Nationally Determined Contributions is discussed in the broad context of ocean-based actions for both mitigation and ecological adaptation. All measures are clustered in three policy-relevant categories (Decisive, Low Regret, Concept Stage). None of the ocean-based NETs assessed are identified as Decisive at this stage. One is Low Regret ( Restoring and increasing coastal vegetation ), and three are at Concept Stage, one with low to moderate potential disbenefits ( Marine bioenergy with carbon capture and storage ) and two with potentially high disbenefits ( Enhancing open-ocean productivity and Enhancing weathering and alkalinization ). Ocean-based NETs are uncertain but potentially highly effective. They have high priority for research and development.
Alexandre Magnan, Raphaël Billé, Laurent Bopp, Vi Chalastani, William W. L. Cheung, Carlos M. Duarte, Jochen Hinkel, J-O Irisson, Elizabeth Mcleod, Fiorenza Micheli, Jack J. Middelburg, Andreas Oschlies, Hans‐Otto Pörtner, Greg H. Rau, Philipp Williamson, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso
Jean‐Pierre Gattuso, Alexandre Magnan, Laurent Bopp, William W. L. Cheung, Carlos M. Duarte, Jochen Hinkel, Elizabeth Mcleod, Fiorenza Micheli, Andreas Oschlies, Phillip Williamson, Raphaël Billé, Vasiliki Ι. Chalastani, Ruth D. Gates, Jean‐Olivier Irisson, Jack J. Middelburg, Hans‐Otto Pörtner, Greg H. Rau
Sabine Fuss, William F. Lamb, Max Callaghan, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer, Wagner de Oliveira Garcia, Jens Hartmann, Tarun Khanna, Gunnar Luderer, Gregory F. Nemet, Joeri Rogelj, Pete Smith, José Luis Vicente‐Vicente, Jennifer Wilcox, Maria del Mar Zamora Dominguez, Jan C. Minx
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.