The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents — Giulio Stefanini (2011) | RDL Network
The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57(22): 2221-2232
Objectives
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient and lesion complexity on outcomes with newer-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES).
Background
Clinical and angiographic outcomes of newer-generation stents have not been described among complex patients.
Methods
Patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were stratified into “complex” and “simple.”
Results
Of 2,292 patients, 1,520 (66.3%) were complex and treated with ZES (n = 764) or EES (n = 756). Event rates were higher among complex patients, and results did not differ between ZES and EES, regardless of complexity. At 1 year, target lesion failure was 8.9% in ZES- and 9.7% in EES-treated complex patients (p = 0.66) and 6.8% in ZES- and 5.7% in EES-treated simple patients (p = 0.55). Rates of cardiac death (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.24), target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.90), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.80) were similar for both stent types among complex patients. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 20 (1.3%) complex patients with no difference between ZES (1.7%) and EES (0.9%, p = 0.26). Angiographic follow-up showed similar results for ZES and EES in terms of in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (22.2 ± 15.4% vs. 21.4 ± 15.8%, p = 0.67) and in-segment binary restenosis (6.6% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) in the complex group.
Conclusions
In this all-comers randomized trial, major adverse cardiovascular events were more frequent among complex than simple patients. The newer-generation ZES and EES proved to be safe and effective, regardless of complexity, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes for both stent types through 1 year. (RESOLUTE-III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084)
Masanori Taniwaki, Giulio Stefanini, Sigmund Silber, Gert Richardt, Pascal Vranckx, Patrick W. Serruys, Paweł Buszman, Henning Kelbæk, Stephan Windecker
Scot Garg, Patrick W. Serruys, Sigmund Silber, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Gert Richardt, Paweł Buszman, Henning Kelbæk, Adrianus J. van Boven, Sjoerd H. Hofma, Axel Linke, Volker Klauß, William Wijns, Carlos Macaya, Philippe Garot, Carlo Di Mario, Ganesh Manoharan, Ran Kornowski, Thomas Ischinger, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Eric van Remortel, Jacintha E. Ronden,
Giulio Stefanini, Bindu Kalesan, Thomas Pilgrim, Lorenz Räber, Yoshinobu Onuma, Sigmund Silber, Patrick W. Serruys, Bernhard Meier, Peter Jüni, Stephan Windecker
Bimmer E. Claessen, Pieter C. Smits, Dean J. Kereiakes, Helen Parise, Martin Fahy, Elvin Kedhi, Patrick W. Serruys, Alexandra J. Lansky, Ecaterina Cristea, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Poornima Sood, Charles A. Simonton, Gregg W. Stone
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.