Nine planetary boundaries have been proposed, capturing essential biophysical processes that sustain the Earth System and its in an accommodating state for humanity. Drawing on literature, we propose conditions under which remaining within these boundaries is in line with economic policy. We assert that pervasive uncertainties combined with impacts of trespassing planetary boundaries clearly legitimate using safe minimum standards or precautionary approaches. Moreover, information about the risk structure of these processes, including potential large-scale regime shifts, could help refine policies for how to relate to the zones of uncertainty of the boundaries. Planetary boundaries may be interpreted as within limits especially in relation to the biophysical expansion of the human dimension. Here, we picture them as warning signs creating incentives for shifting development into new directions, new pathways, where growth in human well-being is the focus rather than growth in GDP. In this sense, we reiterate the framework of ecological of sustainable scale (i.e., developing within planetary boundaries), efficient allocation, and fair distribution, and emphasize the need for biosphere economics to help navigate globalization within the capacity of the as the complex adaptive system it truly is.
Johan Rockström, Louis J. Kotzé, Svetlana Milutinović, Frank Biermann, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan F. Donges, Jonas Ebbesson, Duncan French, Joyeeta Gupta, Rakhyun E. Kim, Timothy M. Lenton, Dominic Lenzi, Nebojša Nakićenović, Barbara Neumann, Fabian Schuppert, Ricarda Winkelmann, Klaus Bosselmann, Carl Folke, Wolfgang Lucht, David Schlosberg, Katherine Richardson, Will Steffen
Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephen R. Carpenter, W. de Vries, Cynthia A. de Wit, Carl Folke, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Georgina M. Mace, Linn Persson, V. Ramanathan, Belinda Reyers, Sverker Sörlin
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.