Purpose\nGFR(glomerular filtration rate) is a fundamental parameter in detecting renal impairment and predicts the progression of renal disease. Because serum creatinine has several disadvantages, serum cystatin C has been recently proposed as a new endogenous marker for GFR. We compared serum cystatin C with creatinine and creatinine clearance to investigate the clinical usefulness of cystatin C.\n\nMethods\nWe retrospectively analyzed 46 patients(60 case numbers) who had various renal diseases and classified them into 3 groups according to creatinine clearance(Group 1 : CrCl <40 mL/min/1.73m2, Group 2 : CrCl 40-60 mL/min/1.73m2, Group 3 : CrCl >60 mL/min/1.73m2). We measured serum creatinine, cystatin C and creatinine clearance and also analyzed the correlations among them.\n\nResults\nSerum cystatin C and creatinine showed a similar correlation to creatinine clearance (r=0.685, r=0.640, respectively) and showed similar diagnostic accuracy in detecting decreased GFR(AUC, cystatin C 0.829 vs. creatinine 0.826, P=0.848). Serum cystatin C showed a greater sensitivity for detecting a decreased GFR than creatinine in Group 2 and 3(Group 1 : 100% vs. 100%, Group 2 : 70% vs. 35%, Group 3 : 46% vs. 15%).\n\nConclusion\nSerum cystatin C could be a useful endogenous marker for GFR and would be superior to serum creatinine in early detection of renal impairment in pediatric patients with renal diseases.
Meletios A Dimopoulos, Paul G. Richardson, Rudolf Schlag, Nuriet K. Khuageva, Ofer Shpilberg, Efstathios Kastritis, Martin Kropff, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Michel Delforge, Julia A. Alexeeva, Rik Schots, Tamás Masszi, María‐Victoria Mateos, William Deraedt, Kevin Liu, Andrew Cakana, Helgi van de Velde, Jesús F. San Miguel
Meletios A Dimopoulos, David S. Siegel, Darrell White, Ralph V. Boccia, Karim Iskander, Zhao Yang, Amy Kimball, Khalid Mezzi, Heinz Ludwig, Rubén Niesvizky
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.